Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > User Forums by Brand > Cakewalk / Sonar Forum


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Cakewalk Cakewalk News Cakewalk Medias Cakewalk Tests Cakewalk Articles Cakewalk User Reviews Cakewalk Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2006
drathbun drathbun is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Age: 53
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 8
drathbun is on a distinguished road
Speeding up audio process selection?

I tend to use the same audio process on numerous tracks over and over again. It gets tedious to go Process / Audio Effects / Sony / Pitch Shift (or) Wavehammer over and over again. There are so many effects in the list, I have to keep scrolling to the same spot all the time.

Is there a way in Sonar 4 to shorten this hunt and peck process? A macro key would be great!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2006
Synkrotron Synkrotron is offline
Midician
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington (UK)
Posts: 405
Rep Power: 47
Synkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by drathbun
I tend to use the same audio process on numerous tracks over and over again. It gets tedious to go Process / Audio Effects / Sony / Pitch Shift (or) Wavehammer over and over again. There are so many effects in the list, I have to keep scrolling to the same spot all the time.

Is there a way in Sonar 4 to shorten this hunt and peck process? A macro key would be great!
Interesting question... It's a pity Sonar doesn't have an effects chainer facility like Sound Forge does... Unless there's another way of achieving the same thing.

I'm at work at the moment but if I get a chance I'll have a look tonight. I'm on Sonar 5 SE but I'm sure that if I can suss something out in 5 it should work in 4
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-12-2006
DM1 DM1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 295
DM1 has a reputation beyond reputeDM1 has a reputation beyond reputeDM1 has a reputation beyond reputeDM1 has a reputation beyond reputeDM1 has a reputation beyond reputeDM1 has a reputation beyond reputeDM1 has a reputation beyond reputeDM1 has a reputation beyond reputeDM1 has a reputation beyond reputeDM1 has a reputation beyond reputeDM1 has a reputation beyond repute
I use the "Clone Track" option a lot, with the "clone events" option unchecked (so it just copies the effects and settings.)

I've also created a template that has 4 tracks, each with all my usual plugins already assigned, and I start new projects from that template. It's way easier to delete tracks that aren't needed than it is to add the same 3 plugins from the enormous plugin list.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-12-2006
Synkrotron Synkrotron is offline
Midician
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington (UK)
Posts: 405
Rep Power: 47
Synkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond reputeSynkrotron has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by DM1
I use the "Clone Track" option a lot, with the "clone events" option unchecked (so it just copies the effects and settings.)

I've also created a template that has 4 tracks, each with all my usual plugins already assigned, and I start new projects from that template. It's way easier to delete tracks that aren't needed than it is to add the same 3 plugins from the enormous plugin list.
I do the same thing (create track templates with plugins already applied) but I think our friend here is on about applying audio processes to individual audio clips rather than adding plugin effects to a track.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-12-2006
drathbun drathbun is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Age: 53
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 8
drathbun is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Synkrotron
I do the same thing (create track templates with plugins already applied) but I think our friend here is on about applying audio processes to individual audio clips rather than adding plugin effects to a track.
Yes, that's true. I guess it is my habit not to overload the CPU with multiple effects on a track. So I'll have a reverb set on the vocal track, record a number of takes and then apply my Sony Wavehammer compressor directly to the waveform and then listen to the mix. I guess the fast thing would be to add the Wavehammer to the FX bin until I'm finished recording. But when I've got multiple tracks and FX it affects CPU performance so I tend to apply the compressor to the track each time.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-12-2006
dachay2tnr's Avatar
dachay2tnr dachay2tnr is offline
One Hit Wonder
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Da Garden State
Posts: 5,140
Rep Power: 786020
dachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by drathbun
I guess the fast thing would be to add the Wavehammer to the FX bin until I'm finished recording.
That's exactly the way Sonar is intended to work. In fact, I never "apply" effects - even at the end of a project.

Obviously, however, a lot depends on your CPU and what it can handle. But until Sonar starts choking, I would leave everything in real time.

BTW, a Wavehammer to every individual track is waayyyyy overkill IMO. You might want to look at your signal chain to find out why your recording signal is so low that you feel this is necessary. You really should only need to apply the Wavehammer to your Master Bus (and *need* is questionable even in that situation).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-12-2006
drathbun drathbun is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Age: 53
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 8
drathbun is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by dachay2tnr
That's exactly the way Sonar is intended to work. In fact, I never "apply" effects - even at the end of a project.

Obviously, however, a lot depends on your CPU and what it can handle. But until Sonar starts choking, I would leave everything in real time.

BTW, a Wavehammer to every individual track is waayyyyy overkill IMO. You might want to look at your signal chain to find out why your recording signal is so low that you feel this is necessary. You really should only need to apply the Wavehammer to your Master Bus (and *need* is questionable even in that situation).
Sorry I must have misstated... I apply Wavehammer directly to a vocal track and then listen to the mix. Then I might retake that track and apply the wavehammer again. I only wavehammer the vocal tracks where I've got a lot of variation. It is just I keep fiddling, retaking, fiddling and retaking. I do not apply the wavehammer to the same track (or multiple tracks) over and over again. I do use it sparingly

I guess I was using that as an example. I have so many effects in a list that I hate having to hit the menu and scroll through the effects to get the reverb I'm looking for. From some of the answers here, I think I'll try the clone track or file template feature. Should be good for grinners!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
External FX -> Can be used as Audio Process - Plugin? mrbowes Cubase User Forum 5 11-03-2005 06:36
Does my Logic Audio Platinum process audio in 32 or 24 bit? pisces7378 Digital Recording & Computers 4 11-19-2002 09:59
ARRGH: Audio folder for recording externally mixed audio in 5.1 Lopp Cubase User Forum 0 10-04-2002 15:54
Audio to PC MIDI Sync mark4man Fostex Forum 0 07-21-2002 08:45
PC DAW Digest TAE Digital Recording & Computers 0 11-25-2000 09:03


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:36.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.