Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Mixing / Mastering


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2006
LordSire's Avatar
LordSire LordSire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O-H TEN
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 4
LordSire is on a distinguished road
if i saved my tracks as mp3's, and not waves, can i still mix without affect to sound

i accidentally saved one of my wavefiles as a mp3 early on in my recording process. In my DAW, when you save as a certain format, anything saved after that will automatically, as a default, save as a mp3 also. I was trying not to "lose my vibe", so i just saved and kept going, without saving and switching BACK to .wav.

My question is; Can I go ahead and mix my tune in my multitrack view, and not have a difference in overall sound, with my "waves" being mp3s? Or should I convert them back to waves? (Or is it too late?)
__________________
THE TRUTH

Last edited by LordSire; 01-05-2006 at 06:24..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2006
noisewreck's Avatar
noisewreck noisewreck is online now
Sound Destroyer
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SoCali
Age: 100
Posts: 1,816
Rep Power: 1008745
noisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond repute
You can mix, but once they're converted to mp3, the quality loss is permanent. You won't gain quality by converting them back to .wav.
__________________
Quote:
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
--George Carlin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2006
LordSire's Avatar
LordSire LordSire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O-H TEN
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 4
LordSire is on a distinguished road
they dont sound like they suffered any "loss" of quality..

Quote:
Originally Posted by noisewreck
You can mix, but once they're converted to mp3, the quality loss is permanent. You won't gain quality by converting them back to .wav.

Am I wrong? Is it a sensitive situation, to where i wont actually HEAR the loss? Or is it better to just say forget it and re-record my vocals? And if not, will adding effects and the like have a negative, audible affect on them?
__________________
THE TRUTH
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2006
Dogman's Avatar
Dogman Dogman is offline
Campeón de la Internet
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Unicorn Heaven
Age: 46
Posts: 15,386
Rep Power: 6187844
Dogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond repute
What bitrate does it save to? A higher one will help. I've worked with some MP3 files that sounded ok. They were 320k.
__________________
I won the internets......
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2006
metalhead28's Avatar
metalhead28 metalhead28 is offline
Hates Raymond
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In a van down by the river
Age: 33
Posts: 2,838
Rep Power: 587356
metalhead28 has a reputation beyond reputemetalhead28 has a reputation beyond reputemetalhead28 has a reputation beyond reputemetalhead28 has a reputation beyond reputemetalhead28 has a reputation beyond reputemetalhead28 has a reputation beyond reputemetalhead28 has a reputation beyond reputemetalhead28 has a reputation beyond reputemetalhead28 has a reputation beyond reputemetalhead28 has a reputation beyond reputemetalhead28 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordSire
Am I wrong? Is it a sensitive situation, to where i wont actually HEAR the loss? Or is it better to just say forget it and re-record my vocals? And if not, will adding effects and the like have a negative, audible affect on them?
It does depend on how sensitive your ears are. Just like some people think that MP3's they downloaded from the internet sound fine, some people would be disgusted trying to use a compressed MP3 in a mix. However, as Dogman said, a higher bitrate would be alot better. If it sounds good enough to you than that's all that really matters.
__________________
Some of my music
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-05-2006
gullfo's Avatar
gullfo gullfo is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Old Tappan, NJ, USA
Posts: 381
Rep Power: 25695
gullfo has a reputation beyond reputegullfo has a reputation beyond reputegullfo has a reputation beyond reputegullfo has a reputation beyond reputegullfo has a reputation beyond reputegullfo has a reputation beyond reputegullfo has a reputation beyond reputegullfo has a reputation beyond reputegullfo has a reputation beyond reputegullfo has a reputation beyond reputegullfo has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordSire
Am I wrong? Is it a sensitive situation, to where i wont actually HEAR the loss? Or is it better to just say forget it and re-record my vocals? And if not, will adding effects and the like have a negative, audible affect on them?
what application are you using? is this mp3 the result of the mix or does your app somehow use mp3 directly as a source file? i think that at worst case, comverting to a WAV file will at least stop any further degradation (assuming you make any "destructive" or permanent updates to the mp3 which would require it to be re-saved as mp3).

if the mp3 is only the result of the output of the mix, then you likely already have the source files in the format used by your application (for example, SONAR uses WAV files for source files but you can export as MP3 if you have that feature enabled).
__________________
Glenn
fossile music
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-05-2006
Massive Master's Avatar
Massive Master Massive Master is offline
MASSIVE Mastering, LLC
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago area, probably looking for more coffee.
Age: 42
Posts: 5,385
Rep Power: 1294717
Massive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordSire
Am I wrong? Is it a sensitive situation, to where i wont actually HEAR the loss? Or is it better to just say forget it and re-record my vocals? And if not, will adding effects and the like have a negative, audible affect on them?
As mentioned, a very high-res (320k) mp3, done by a very high-quality codec, can sound pretty good. Readily audible or not, there is permanent and substantial data loss.

I'm almost a little confused - You have a multi-track project going on and the *individual tracks* are MP3's?
__________________
John Scrip - MASSIVE Mastering


Spoon-feed a newbie the answer and he'll mix for a day --
Spark his curiosity to find the answer himself and he'll mix for a lifetime...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2006
LordSire's Avatar
LordSire LordSire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O-H TEN
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 4
LordSire is on a distinguished road
sorry guys. Been MIA for a couple.....

I hope you guys come back and read this. Lemme see....The bitrate is 128.
Yes, Massive; They are individual tracks WITHIN my multitrack mix. I was told by my cousin in Atlanta, that he has some quality engineers working on projects that he has produced. With me asking for mixing/mastering help, he told me to save my files (ind. tracks), as mp3's, and send them to him via email, and he'd be able to work on it from there. After I did that, IN CEP 2.1, when you save as a specific filename, it automatically sets itself to the LAST save command as default. So in this case, when I went to the next track, or file to save, it was defaulted to mp3's. I wasn't paying attention to that, and half of my next projects' tracks were saved as mp3's before i noticed. Then I was reading an old thread that stated that I SHOULDN'T be doing this; mixing my individual tracks in my multitrack, when they are mp3's, because of the loss and degradation of the sound. (?)
__________________
THE TRUTH
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2006
Cloneboy Studio Cloneboy Studio is offline
.
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,056
Rep Power: 8
Cloneboy Studio will become famous soon enough
128 MP3's actually sound pretty nasty. I dunno... is there any way you can go back and find the original wav files?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2006
fraserhutch's Avatar
fraserhutch fraserhutch is offline
Flypaper for freaks
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kirkland, Washington
Posts: 3,811
Rep Power: 427631
fraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond reputefraserhutch has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordSire
I hope you guys come back and read this. Lemme see....The bitrate is 128.
Yes, Massive; They are individual tracks WITHIN my multitrack mix. I was told by my cousin in Atlanta, that he has some quality engineers working on projects that he has produced. With me asking for mixing/mastering help, he told me to save my files (ind. tracks), as mp3's, and send them to him via email, and he'd be able to work on it from there. After I did that, IN CEP 2.1, when you save as a specific filename, it automatically sets itself to the LAST save command as default. So in this case, when I went to the next track, or file to save, it was defaulted to mp3's. I wasn't paying attention to that, and half of my next projects' tracks were saved as mp3's before i noticed. Then I was reading an old thread that stated that I SHOULDN'T be doing this; mixing my individual tracks in my multitrack, when they are mp3's, because of the loss and degradation of the sound. (?)
MP3s of that bitrate suffer a severe degradation of sound. Your cousin should NEVER have suggested that you send him mp3s; in fact, I do not know of anyone who works with mp3s at all. Rather, conversion to mp3 is performed as a last step (after mastering), and only if you absolutely must go there at all. As a rule, I never convert to mp3s, and leave it to the end user to do so if they choose.
__________________
The fact that no one understands you doesn't mean you're an artist...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-08-2006
LordSire's Avatar
LordSire LordSire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O-H TEN
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 4
LordSire is on a distinguished road
So basically....

I must go and re-record my vocals, and save them as .wav for optimum results in sound quality, huh? I can pretty much conclude I was "led a stray" by my cousin, and he will be cussed out from here to Baghdad when i talk to him, because that's fuc#@& up!!! Especially for someone who claims they can "get the results" i want. I shoulda' known better. I guess that means i'm back to the "drawing board". If there is no way to get the same sound quality by using mp3's, then I WANT to re-record. So if that's the case, don't hold back by NOT telling me that's what i should do: By the time it's posted, I will have already cried and sucked it up, so i'll be pretty prepared to handle the "news".
__________________
THE TRUTH
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-08-2006
LordSire's Avatar
LordSire LordSire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O-H TEN
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 4
LordSire is on a distinguished road
No.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloneboy Studio
128 MP3's actually sound pretty nasty. I dunno... is there any way you can go back and find the original wav files?

I messed up on this one, Clone, I know. I can just feel it, from the time I read that post on mp3's and mixing. Because the mp3's ARE the original files. That's what they were saved as from the onset. I know now that I should have never listened to my damn cousin. And to think I was about to go all the way to Atlanta, because I was told that I would be better off to record there, with all the "high-end" gear and "experienced" engineers he's supposed to have at his disposal. Yeah right!!!! I cant wait to tell him he's a dumb-ass, AND his so called engineers that said it was ok to send mp3's for mixing! Luckily, I'm an "accomplished" vocalist, so re-recording won't be ALL that bad, even tho that's not what i would like to be doing at this stage of my project, but i'll live.

I'm gonna' hip him and his little "crew" to the BBS!!! Maybe they can learn somethin'!
__________________
THE TRUTH
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-08-2006
Dogman's Avatar
Dogman Dogman is offline
Campeón de la Internet
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Unicorn Heaven
Age: 46
Posts: 15,386
Rep Power: 6187844
Dogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond reputeDogman has a reputation beyond repute
You can try and mix the Mp3's, but there could be some substantial loss. Won't hurt to try, but at least now you hopefully won't forget this, and lose files again. I've done the same, as far as saving something only as an MP3, and tehn wanting to have the original back.
Hopefully you won't have any difficulty re-tracking the parts. Good luck, man.
Ed
__________________
I won the internets......
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-08-2006
LordSire's Avatar
LordSire LordSire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O-H TEN
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 4
LordSire is on a distinguished road
Thanx, Dog.

What's funny, they dont sound like they're suffering much quality loss. Their "hot" and clear. But i think im gonna' go back, redo them, and compare the two just to "see". And believe me, I won't make this mistake again! And I won't listen to my cousin!

Good Lookin'-
__________________
THE TRUTH
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-08-2006
noisewreck's Avatar
noisewreck noisewreck is online now
Sound Destroyer
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SoCali
Age: 100
Posts: 1,816
Rep Power: 1008745
noisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond reputenoisewreck has a reputation beyond repute
When you listen to them individually, by themselves, you may think they sound fine. However, when you compare them with the original uncompressed .wav or .aiff, you'll definitely hear the difference. If you can't, then you're in the wrong field
__________________
Quote:
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
--George Carlin
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-09-2006
LordSire's Avatar
LordSire LordSire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O-H TEN
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 4
LordSire is on a distinguished road
I feel ya'

I see what you're saying. But you have to understand, I've never compared the "two" in contrast to one another. I've never understood until recently joining this site, about the actuality of codecs and exactly what do they, and many other aspects, dealing with what may lead to sound degradation, meant to the digital domain.

I'll see what i can do to make sure im not in the wrong field. Thanx.
If you (anyone) has any more knowledge/opinions of this subject, "have at it."
(I'm listening)
__________________
THE TRUTH
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-09-2006
karyoker karyoker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 0
karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker
Nothing will compare to recording wav's but something you might try is this. With the mp3 track bounced down to stereo arm a new track...I then rerecord through a system with a dfx12 and external fx, then through a bbe362 then an aphex 204...Monitor the vocals with cans and monitors both..

It wont bring back all but its better than the mp3.....
__________________
Sing Jam Record Rock and If The Sun's Comin Up Somebody Make Some Coffee
Karaoke in Colorado
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-10-2006
LordSire's Avatar
LordSire LordSire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: O-H TEN
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 4
LordSire is on a distinguished road
Ha! Haaaaaaaa!

Quote:
Originally Posted by karyoker
Nothing will compare to recording wav's but something you might try is this. With the mp3 track bounced down to stereo arm a new track...I then rerecord through a system with a dfx12 and external fx, then through a bbe362 then an aphex 204...Monitor the vocals with cans and monitors both..

It wont bring back all but its better than the mp3.....

Now, all I have to do, Karyoker, is find a translator adept at interpreting that "Japanese Ghetto Slang" you just wrote back there! LMAO

You lost me right after "something you might try is this."
__________________
THE TRUTH
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-10-2006
karyoker karyoker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 0
karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker karyoker
Sorry... All I was suggesting was convert the mp3 vocal to stereo Then play back through an external system using analogue fx and audio processors, and record again back into your software... It then can be exported as a wav better than the mp3 original....
__________________
Sing Jam Record Rock and If The Sun's Comin Up Somebody Make Some Coffee
Karaoke in Colorado
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:45.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.