Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > User Forums by Brand > Cubase User Forum


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Steinberg Steinberg News Steinberg Medias Steinberg Tests Steinberg Articles Steinberg User Reviews Steinberg Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-23-2005
rio452001 rio452001 is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 0
rio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond repute
Cubase VST 5.1: Buffer settings & memory per channel

Hi there,

I'm using Cubase VST 5.1, with a Pentium 4 (plenty of RAM, hard drive space etc) and a Delta 66 soundcard

I'm getting some skips & clicks & noise etc, and it's been suggested that I try changing the buffer settings & memory per channel in my audio set up.

Right now, I've got the buffer settings at their lowest setting (32), and I'm increasing the memory per channel to about 748 or so.

Is there an "optimum" setting for memory per channel?

I won't be using more than a total of about 8 to 12 tracks in total (but I'll be recording 6 simultaneously).

Any help or comments would be appreciated.

Regards,

Rio
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-23-2005
Raw-Tracks Raw-Tracks is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 624
Rep Power: 16376
Raw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond repute
It's been a while since I've used VST5, but I think you're on the right track. There is certainly no harm in at least trying. I don't know if you need to go as high as you mentioned, but certainly try increasing those buffers.

I remember when I changed my setting from a pretty low setting to a higher setting, my disk activity went way down. I did not notice any negative side effects fromt he change either.

Good Luck!
__________________
Eric

Practice Your Mixing Skills!
Mix Our Tracks in Your DAW!
www.Raw-Tracks.com
Online Mixing Forum
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-23-2005
rio452001 rio452001 is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 0
rio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond repute
Hi Raw tracks,

Do you mean to increase the buffer setting? Or increase only the memory per channel?

When I increase the buffer setting, I get more noise on playback.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-23-2005
Raw-Tracks Raw-Tracks is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 624
Rep Power: 16376
Raw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by rio452001
Hi Raw tracks,

Do you mean to increase the buffer setting? Or increase only the memory per channel?

When I increase the buffer setting, I get more noise on playback.
Sorry, I'm going of off memory here. What I was trying to say is to increase the Memory Per Channel, or however they refer to that setting.
__________________
Eric

Practice Your Mixing Skills!
Mix Our Tracks in Your DAW!
www.Raw-Tracks.com
Online Mixing Forum
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-24-2005
rio452001 rio452001 is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 0
rio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond reputerio452001 has a reputation beyond repute
sound card buffer settings

aha, I also see there are buffer settings on my Delta 66 soundcard...

I had it set to 800, which gave something like 19 ms of latency... I moved it up to 1056, which gives 25ms latency

the noise seems to be much better, but there still seems to be the occasional thing...

should I bump it up higher?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-24-2005
Raw-Tracks Raw-Tracks is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 624
Rep Power: 16376
Raw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond reputeRaw-Tracks has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by rio452001
aha, I also see there are buffer settings on my Delta 66 soundcard...

I had it set to 800, which gave something like 19 ms of latency... I moved it up to 1056, which gives 25ms latency

the noise seems to be much better, but there still seems to be the occasional thing...

should I bump it up higher?
The buffer settings on your Delta card may help you. However, if you're only using about 12 tracks, such high buffer setting should not be necessary. It seems there is something else that is causing problems.

Need to know more specifics on your computer. What are all of your hardware specs? Are you also running anti-virus software? You need to disable your anti-virus while recording.
__________________
Eric

Practice Your Mixing Skills!
Mix Our Tracks in Your DAW!
www.Raw-Tracks.com
Online Mixing Forum
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cubase SX & Laptop- Memory spikes?!?! therealside Cubase User Forum 4 05-15-2005 20:18
Cubase VST delay compensation KeithCF Cubase User Forum 1 04-21-2005 14:54
Cubase VST: Panning & Stereo Separation rio452001 Cubase User Forum 0 12-23-2004 07:58
Sequencing with Cubase VST & recording audio with Protools. All suggestions welcome anppilot1 Digital Recording & Computers 10 11-19-2003 11:50
Cubase vst 5.0 not working on new DAW morindae Cubase User Forum 1 07-28-2003 14:30


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:28.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.