Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Studio Building & Display


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2005
jonmmartin jonmmartin is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 0
jonmmartin is on a distinguished road
Smile 703 and 705 Mixed?

Would it be beneficial to glue 2" 703 to 2" 705 for more broad band absorbtion? Can you get the benefit of both this way?
Thanks for the help.
__________________
Golden Ears? - Not Yet...but working on it!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-21-2005
bpape's Avatar
bpape bpape is offline
Acoustic Designer - GIK
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wildwood, MO (St. Louis)
Age: 50
Posts: 653
Rep Power: 36970
bpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond reputebpape has a reputation beyond repute
Certainly. If you want the ability of the less dense 703 for grabbing shallow reflections but still want the extra density, mount the 703 exposed to the room and the 705 behind it.

I'll say again what I've said before though - for the price of 705, you can buy almost double the quantity of 703 - so for the price of 2" 703 and 2" 705, you can almost but 6" of 703 which will do a better job. If you already have the materials or don't have the room to do 6", the mixing is a good way to go.
__________________
I am serious... and don't call me Shirley
GIK Acoustics
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-21-2005
jonmmartin jonmmartin is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 0
jonmmartin is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the reply...So if I read you correctly... 4" of 705 is better than 2" of each. Also, did you say that 705 is less expencive then 703?
Thanks again.
__________________
Golden Ears? - Not Yet...but working on it!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-21-2005
Innovations's Avatar
Innovations Innovations is offline
1K Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,458
Rep Power: 28884
Innovations has a reputation beyond reputeInnovations has a reputation beyond reputeInnovations has a reputation beyond reputeInnovations has a reputation beyond reputeInnovations has a reputation beyond reputeInnovations has a reputation beyond reputeInnovations has a reputation beyond reputeInnovations has a reputation beyond reputeInnovations has a reputation beyond reputeInnovations has a reputation beyond reputeInnovations has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonmmartin
Thanks for the reply...So if I read you correctly... 4" of 705 is better than 2" of each. Also, did you say that 705 is less expencive then 703?
Thanks again.
Other way around. The 5 is more expenisve. The 3 and 5 in the numbers represent the density in pounds per cubic foot. The 705 has more fiberglass in it than the 703 (and the 703 therefore has more air) Since air is a lot cheaper than fiberglass of course the 703 will be cheaper. So unless space is constrained it usually makes more sense to just go with a thicker stack of 703 on a bang for the buck basis.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PLace in Missouri has 703 IN STOCK! jeff5xo Studio Building & Display 8 09-08-2004 19:54
Source for OC 705? RichHead Studio Building & Display 3 03-20-2003 09:16


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 22:30.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.