![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi guyz....
i would like to ask for sum advice. when recording vocalz and guitar wat's the best format example like: (wav , mono , 8bit) . wat should i save it in ? and the same for recording guitar. thnx Bruce ![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
You might get a few different opinions on this but here's what I do:
Record and mix all sources at 44.1/24. Then dither to 44.1/16 and save the stereo mixdown as .wav file, this is the necessary sample rate, bit depth and file format for burning to CD so that it will play on most commercial CD players. Most things I record in mono but there are a few things which sound nice when recorded in stereo like acosutic guitar and large instruments like piano, particularly if those sources are the main instrument in a sparse mix. This is really a taste thing though and depends on the type of music, sound you're going for etc. Of course your setup might not allow recording at 44.1/24 in which case it might be an idea to let us know what gear you're using.
__________________
"Just give the great unwashed a pair of oversized breasts and a happy ending, and they'll 'oink' for more every time." C. M. Burns http://www.shuttleworths.co.uk/micloop.gif |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
8 bit for the vocals
4 bit for the guitar will give you more distortion ![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd also go for 24 bit 44.1khz.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
but thnx everyone for giving me advice.i was really needing to know more about this !! thnx Bruce |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
44.1 / 24Bit is standard for small personal prjects (cuz this is the sample rate for CD's) The pro's use up to 192KHz / 24 Bit
I always record @ 24 bit just because it gives you more headroom and the signal doesnt need to be as hot! though its still advisable to set levelsa properly. Type Linear Pulse Code modulation into google for more info! Hope this helps Chris |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
there's a LOT of missinformed people giving out bad advice on this board. The standard for Red Book CD is 44.1/16Bit. You have to DITHER down to 16 Bit from 24Bit after recording......best left to a mastering engineer that knows what he's doing (especialy if you think standard CDs are 24Bit) ![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
To be fair, he did just say "cuz this is the sample rate for CD's." So technically he is right; but yeah, misinfo is rampant around here.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Check out my band!! www.myspace.com/darkvelvetlaughter GFCG Membership No:000 019 |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
It doesnt take an engineer to Dither. Its simple as clicking a button.
standard CDs arent 24 bit??? Wait, so this 24 bit mp3 cd is fake!!bastards! Quote:
__________________
http://www.capitolflags.com/images/c...ebel-small.gif |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
what I ment there was.....if you're gonna have your tracks mastered, it's best to leave them at 24bit for the mastering process THEN dither down..... sure you can do it yourself but...
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Your MP3 disc is a data disc, not an audio disc, even though many players now days will play its files. The only advantage is the amount of data you can get on there. Unfortunately the fact that MP3 throws out over half of the music data in order to compress the files to such small size makes MP3 sound quality far inferior. Giving an MP3 to a mastering engineer is like giving an Oscar Mayer hot dog to Julia Child. G. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh man... if you even have to ask if 8 bit is good for recording vocals I think you've got some reading to do.
Unless you're going for a lo-fi sound, or you're trying to replicate something from the 1920's. Most people in home studios will get away with 44.1khz at 24 bits and you won't get too many complaints about quality. If your card can't go up to 24, record as high as it will go. If it doesn't go higher than 16, consider getting a new one before recording anything you want to sound good.
__________________
The number 1 cause of death in games is panic. http://webpages.charter.net/sonicclang/small.jpg www.myspace.com/sonicclangmusic Please check out my studio construction videos on youtube!!! Click here |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well......actually a lot of mastering engineers use the same dithering as most of us have available: UV-HR22, POW-IR, or whatever the names are. But their expertise can come into play with which one to use in a certain set of circumstances.
Speaking of delivery formats, one of my clients was going to take his stuff to be mastered by a guy(former national band musician) who required the songs to be delivered in Ogg Vorbis format. I couldn't figure the logic behind that one at all. So of course I talked them out of using that guy. And hey, my Nintendo™ is 8-bit. Are you saying its sound isn't good enough! ![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Question relating to this
Is it actually worth it then recording music at 96khz?
__________________
"Introduce a little anarchy. Upset the established order, and everything becomes chaos. I'm an agent of chaos. Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It's fair..." |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Personally I choose to stick with the target sample rate, mainly because several people who know quite a bit more than I do about the subject have concluded that there's no great benefit recording above 44.1 (for audio). In his white paper on sampling rates Dan lavry (who knows a thing or two about A-D conversion) even concluded that recording at really high sampling rates can actually degrade the audio. Bit depth is another matter, 24 is much easier to work with than 16.
__________________
"Just give the great unwashed a pair of oversized breasts and a happy ending, and they'll 'oink' for more every time." C. M. Burns http://www.shuttleworths.co.uk/micloop.gif |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How can I improve my SM57 recording quality? *audio clip* | Jsn7821 | Recording Techniques | 18 | 01-17-2005 05:01 |
| vs-840, HELP RECORDING BAND!!! bad quality, bad quality, distorted | mateenj | Other Equipment and Reviews | 6 | 11-20-2004 08:39 |
| Computer recording quality/ Real audio problem | larryamon | Digital Recording & Computers | 4 | 02-25-2004 11:40 |
| quality recording on roland 16 track | guitar3722 | Recording Techniques | 1 | 06-24-2002 14:29 |