![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hey -
After a decade of analog tape experience, I am planning a new home multitrack studio and I have a gear purchase question at the end of this post: I plan to use my Tascam 8x4x2 mixing board for recording into a pc w/multitrack software via a sound card (or interface), but I am not sure which cards to seriously consider. I am a guitar-based singer-songwriter who uses drum machine and lots of backing vocals. Very little if any MIDI/synth. For my new projects, I plan to record only 1-2 tracks simultaneously, though I may someday expand to 3-4. No full-blown live bands, though. For my old projects, I have a Tascam 8-track 1/2" tape recorder (from 1991) that I would like to attempt extracting my old analog tracks digitally and remixing them, either 'in the box' or through my mixer. I have been steered toward the M-Audio Delta 1010, which sounds like a suitable piece for my needs. I know that there is a $200 difference between the 1010 and its 'LT' version. One difference is that the LT has pre-amps I don't need (since I have a mixer); how important is this? Another difference, I think, has to do with plug-in access/convenience. Can anyone *please* comment/advise me on this before I slap plastic? Thanx... |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well....the 1010 has a breakout box that separates the a/d conversion from the PCI, which is said to provide for a better conversion. Also, I think the converters in the 1010 are better.
Also, if you like the pre's in your mixer, I'd go for the 1010. Well, I'd go for the 1010 anyway.... ![]()
__________________
Myriad Rocker My Web Design/Production Company: Myriad Productions My Band: Black Leaf Clover |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
the 1010 has balanced 1/4" inputs on the breakout box. most of the ins on the lt are unbalanced (RCA), & no breakout box.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
all told, the 1010 is the better choice. you can usually find used ones for between $250 and $350. i might add.....i have a 1010 and work with it for an hour or two on just about a daily basis. it does a fine job. cheers, wade |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have both, the 1010 is what u need for the best quality, noise floor, and convenience. U can mount the break out box in your rack, or put it in a convenienent spot near your mixer. The cable between the breakout box and your computer is long enough to put some distance between your computer, a source of electrical noise, and your audio connections. U can switch between +4 and -10 dBu on the breakout box for each connection, all of which are TRS balanced connectors. It is sturdy, and has a lifetime warranty if I remember correctly. I'm not a sales rep, just a very satisfied user.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
how does it work with the computer
the 1010 seemed great to me, put it together with an octane, or a presonus digimax, and you´re ready to go, but one question for those with more experience, how good does the card interact with the pc, i heard the fastest systems (asio 2 or so) run on usb or firewire connections
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| delta 1010 questions | petty300 | Digital Recording & Computers | 7 | 12-28-2004 14:40 |
| Please help compare and define M-Audio 2496 v. Delta 410 v. Delta 44 v. Delta 1010 | danielshawn | Digital Recording & Computers | 6 | 12-31-2003 02:15 |
| Windows XP & Delta... | delphonic | Digital Recording & Computers | 2 | 12-06-2003 15:27 |
| ST Audio dsp3000 vs Delta 1010 and the like | Chris Fallen | Digital Recording & Computers | 4 | 04-07-2003 01:54 |
| Delta 44 & Delta 1010 | Garak | Digital Recording & Computers | 1 | 09-01-2002 15:15 |