Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > Equipment Forums > The Rack


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Studio-effect Studio-effect News Studio-effect Medias Studio-effect Tests Studio-effect Articles Studio-effect User Reviews Studio-effect Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2005
sucram sucram is offline
thosewhospeakdonotknow
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: CT
Age: 34
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 9
sucram is on a distinguished road
DMP3 digital out?

The MAudio website for the DMP3 has an image showing "connectivity". It shows a "digital audio" connection to a "digital recorder". This preamp doesn't have a digital out though, does it???

http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_gb/DMP3-focus.html

I'm looking for a preamp for generic purposes. I've got a Sony ECM MS907 stereo mic (with a stereo minijack connector) that I've been using with my minidisc recorder for sampling and field recording, and I just inherited a CAD E100 condenser which I think is supposed to be fairly clean. Any thoughts on why I shouldn't pick up the DMP3? I'd like to utilize the stereo mic since the preamps in the MD recorder are crap (or the mic itself is crap, or both) since it's far too easy to overload and the combo is a bit noisy so I can't lower gain too well.

The alternative I'm thinking about is the VTB1 which has gotten favorable reviews. Though it's not stereo, it looks like it's cheap enough to get 2. I'm not looking to record in a "gold channel" way. As long as the signal is relatively clean with low noise (pretty crucial) and there's a respectable amount of headroom I'd be happy. I'd prefer to not have to get an outboard compressor. Again, this is for sample recording, from crickets at night (with a long extension cord obviously) to pots and pans in the bathroom. I'd still probably record to the line in on the minidisc, or straight into my Delta 66.

I'd appreciate any thoughts, and my budget is as low as possible. I really prefer to buy new.

Thanks in advance,
marcus
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2005
MadAudio's Avatar
MadAudio MadAudio is offline
Damned if I do
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: D.C.
Age: 45
Posts: 11,997
Rep Power: 1244112
MadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond repute
First of all the DMP3 is a two channel pre, not stereo. And you are correct, it does not have a digital output.
__________________
Newest endeavor: Playing drums in a live band version of 7 Door Sedan's music.
__________________

"Do yourself a favour just shut up, read up then put up." --muttley600
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2005
warble's Avatar
warble warble is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Michigan
Age: 38
Posts: 1,006
Rep Power: 0
warble has a reputation beyond reputewarble has a reputation beyond reputewarble has a reputation beyond reputewarble has a reputation beyond reputewarble has a reputation beyond reputewarble has a reputation beyond reputewarble has a reputation beyond reputewarble has a reputation beyond reputewarble has a reputation beyond reputewarble has a reputation beyond reputewarble has a reputation beyond repute
I can tell you that I like the VTB-1. It's clean, and has worked well for me on vox. The DMP3 is smashing as well though (no digital out) - if you need the two channels. I think the VTB-1 is going for around $100, so two of those would be a bit more than the DMP3, but you can't go wrong with either.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2005
sucram sucram is offline
thosewhospeakdonotknow
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: CT
Age: 34
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 9
sucram is on a distinguished road
i figured it was too good to be true. it would have been nice to go digital straight from the preamp into the MD. i imagine i'll still probably go with it though. it shouldn't be too hard to split the stereo minijack into two 1/4" lines.

thanks for the replies,
marcus
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Analog VS. Digital Tunes68 Recording Techniques 51 04-13-2005 06:52
Harder to get that "mesh" in digital than analog? producerkid Other Equipment and Reviews 6 01-31-2005 20:26
Digital Drum Tracks dmemphis Digital Recording & Computers 2 01-28-2003 18:26
Digital Mixers vs. Analog Mixers... pisces7378 Digital Recording & Computers 6 03-23-2002 10:00
The new myth about digital . . . chessrock The Rack 51 03-05-2002 04:21


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 21:47.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.