Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > Equipment Forums > Microphones


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Microphone Microphone News Microphone Medias Microphone Tests Microphone Articles Microphone User Reviews Microphone Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-06-2005
Inspired Inspired is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 148
Rep Power: 7
Inspired is on a distinguished road
Which Mic for Acoustic/Classical?

I'm pretty sure I need a good condensor mic. But which one? I need something that will produce good results in front of a classical or steel-string acoustic. I have an SM-57, but I've always heard that a good condensor will produce better results. Seems like the SM-57 sounded a little too boomy for acoustic anyway. Maybe a Sennheiser?...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-06-2005
trenttati trenttati is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 968
trenttati has a reputation beyond reputetrenttati has a reputation beyond reputetrenttati has a reputation beyond reputetrenttati has a reputation beyond reputetrenttati has a reputation beyond reputetrenttati has a reputation beyond reputetrenttati has a reputation beyond reputetrenttati has a reputation beyond reputetrenttati has a reputation beyond reputetrenttati has a reputation beyond reputetrenttati has a reputation beyond repute
I'm not an expert, but I'll add what I can.

Yes, a good condensor will give you a much fuller, more realistic sound than an sm57. I record a lot of acoustic guitars from classical to flamenco to american folk and rock. I most often use a Sennheiser MD421-II at the 12th fret pointed at the sound hole and about 4-5" from the neck for my primary sound. I'll throw an AT 4040 (there's your LD condensor) a few feet back for more room sound. If you don't have a nice room, you may wish to not use the condensor or put it closer up on the guitar.

For added versatility at mix-down (lots of multitracking in my studio) I'll put a sm57, a beta58 or an E609 on the lower body, pointed towards the sound hole. Be sure to pull it back enough to avoid a boomy proximity effect.

If you use more than one mic, also be sure to avoid phase issues; if something sounds funny or frequencies are missing, hit the phase reverse switch on your pre-amp for one or the other mic.

The md421-II is well worth the money. I use this mic for everything and want a few more! The multi-stage low-cut makes it friendly for everything from boomy toms to bright mandolins.

Oh yeah, a lot of pro's use two small diaphram condensors a few feet back (in a nice room) instead of the setup I just described. I'll let someone else cover this...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-2005
EddieRay's Avatar
EddieRay EddieRay is offline
#?
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Age: 54
Posts: 892
Rep Power: 49953
EddieRay has a reputation beyond reputeEddieRay has a reputation beyond reputeEddieRay has a reputation beyond reputeEddieRay has a reputation beyond reputeEddieRay has a reputation beyond reputeEddieRay has a reputation beyond reputeEddieRay has a reputation beyond reputeEddieRay has a reputation beyond reputeEddieRay has a reputation beyond reputeEddieRay has a reputation beyond reputeEddieRay has a reputation beyond repute
I need to experiement more with my nylon string, but so far an SDC (AT4041) over my right shoulder and an LDC (MK219) out front about 3-4 feet works pretty good. Last time I tried an XY pair of MK012's about 2 feet out front and I liked it too.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-06-2005
punkin's Avatar
punkin punkin is offline
Univalve & Avatar Speaks
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Somewhere in the Mountain States
Age: 46
Posts: 3,373
Rep Power: 291411
punkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond repute
I used to do mostly close (4 to 5 inches) xy micing on acoustic guitars but I sure had a heck of a time dealing with breathing and other body sounds not to mention emphasized finger sounds. Now that I've got a nice place to work, I like to get back several feet 4 to 8 feet. Things seem to get a little more natural sounding at that distance when working on classical stuff. For a more less polished sound more imtimacy as in folk, jazz, easy what ever....I like to get in at 1 to 2 feet. Still find xy very nice but with a quiet room I can experiment a little more.

I still favor my mxl603's and the dragon fly's.
__________________
She's not the boss of me
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-2005
sdelsolray sdelsolray is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 791
Rep Power: 921
sdelsolray has a reputation beyond reputesdelsolray has a reputation beyond reputesdelsolray has a reputation beyond reputesdelsolray has a reputation beyond reputesdelsolray has a reputation beyond reputesdelsolray has a reputation beyond reputesdelsolray has a reputation beyond reputesdelsolray has a reputation beyond reputesdelsolray has a reputation beyond reputesdelsolray has a reputation beyond reputesdelsolray has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inspired
I'm pretty sure I need a good condensor mic. But which one? I need something that will produce good results in front of a classical or steel-string acoustic. I have an SM-57, but I've always heard that a good condensor will produce better results. Seems like the SM-57 sounded a little too boomy for acoustic anyway. Maybe a Sennheiser?...
Help us out a bit. What's your budget and recording signal chain?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-06-2005
Richard Monroe Richard Monroe is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Framingham, Mass. (near Boston)
Age: 55
Posts: 5,471
Rep Power: 808501
Richard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Monroe has a reputation beyond repute
I can only talk in general terms, because every situation is different. I've had my best luck with steel string acoustic using one large diaphragm mic somewhere near the 12th fret, maybe 8" out. I've had my best luck on nylon strings with a small diaphragm pair X-Y, backed off 4 feet or so. I really don't know what it is sonically that makes those setups so different, but the setup for nylon just isn't the same as the one for steel, for me. The general rules are: 1. Almost any combination of 2 mics can work. 2 SD, 2 LD, one of each, or even a dynamic and a condenser. Ribbons can be very good, but....
My guess is that a man with one SM57 probably isn't planning on spending $2000 or so on a mic at the current time. The guys have mentioned a few cheap standards that work. MXL603, MXLV67 (yes, on acoustic), Studio Projects B-1, CAD M179 all come to mind.
But this brings you to rule #2- All other things being equal, the more you spend on mics and preamps, the better it will sound, and as the price goes up, you will get less and less improvement per dollar. Diminishing returns, so 65% of the money is spent on the last 10% of performance. You have to decide what you're willing and able to spend on sound, and then live with it.
I think it's interesting that some folks like the Dragonfly on acoustic. I wish I owned one, but I'm not very fond of the Kiwi, which I do own, on acoustic (it's a pretty good vocal mic for the right voice). I've gotten more usable acoustic tracks with a C414. But here we're talking $600-$800 mics. In the budget world, here's my rule #3- Use small diaphragm mics on good guitars and large diaphragm or colored mics on cheap guitars. If you have a nice guitar, MXL603 is a good choice. If you play a beater, try AKG C2000B. Under $200 with the shock mount, it's a versatile little bugger. It's a side addressed small diaphragm mic in a larger housing than a pencil mic, which makes it a pretty useful vocal mic, as well as being good on guitars, especially cheap ones. It actually makes an Ovation sound pretty good, which means, to me, that it's not that accurate. That's why I like it. It's like makeup. Sometimes you'd rather hear a pleasing illusion.
Finally, you are stuck with rule #4- If the guitar and the song and the room and the player do not suck, your recording probably won't suck. The room is huge on effect. I don't like acoustic in dead rooms, and I don't own the high end FX boxes it would take to recreate a good sounding room. I also lack the expertise. I am lucky to have a pretty good live room, requiring minimal treatment to get good sound. The sound of the room is a key. Best of luck-Richie
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-06-2005
punkin's Avatar
punkin punkin is offline
Univalve & Avatar Speaks
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Somewhere in the Mountain States
Age: 46
Posts: 3,373
Rep Power: 291411
punkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond reputepunkin has a reputation beyond repute
hmmm...seems this dude knows what he's talkin' 'bout
__________________
She's not the boss of me
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-06-2005
gomp gomp is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 0
gomp is on a distinguished road
I'll second that last post: had great results with two Studio Projects B1 in XY.
Especially on classical guitar.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-06-2005
XLR XLR is offline
______
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,490
Rep Power: 2070509
XLR has a reputation beyond reputeXLR has a reputation beyond reputeXLR has a reputation beyond reputeXLR has a reputation beyond reputeXLR has a reputation beyond reputeXLR has a reputation beyond reputeXLR has a reputation beyond reputeXLR has a reputation beyond reputeXLR has a reputation beyond reputeXLR has a reputation beyond reputeXLR has a reputation beyond repute
Some that I've tried that can sound good in different situations (All around $100 or so I think)... B'er ECM8000, MXL990, MXL603s, MXLV67, EV635a. Whatever the mic or position, the room's high freq characteristics are always the make-it-or-break-it thing for me with nylon string sound. A couple current posts with different mic's:

603s:http://www.homerecording.com/bbs/sho...91#post1450991

Beyer M160 (but it's more $): http://www.homerecording.com/bbs/sho...34#post1448134

Tim
__________________
It's easy to pose as an audio expert.
Do a background check... listen to their work.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
nanocomp better than art tube mic pre? trdn1 Other Equipment and Reviews 2 03-11-2006 12:22
FYI - Thinking of getting a Marshall mic - you need to read this! bvaleria Microphones 30 10-05-2005 08:16
Groove Tubes " The Brick" Mic pRe cradlefish The Rack 16 12-06-2004 17:07
A Tale of 3 AKGs, a C1 and a U-87. ausrock Microphones 110 08-05-2001 08:33


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 22:39.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.