Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Analog Only


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Recorder-multitrack Recorder-multitrack News Recorder-multitrack Medias Recorder-multitrack Tests Recorder-multitrack Articles Recorder-multitrack User Reviews Recorder-multitrack Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
Fostex B-16D issues

Ok, maybe I got what I paid for this time.

It's a Fostex B-16D, 16 track 1/2" tape machine. For those of you curious bout its features, here's the jist:

One speed - 15 ips
Dolby C NR (whether you like it or not, can't be turned off)
2 head design (making calibration of rec levels and bias nearly impossible)

I really don't care about the above limitations. What's bugging the crap outta me is that the electronics are noisy. When listening to the tape-outs on my mixer, at modest, unity levels, and turning the tape machine on, an incriminating hiss protrudes through my monitors. It's not my mixer. I'm 150% positive that the tape out circuits are all noisy. It's not bad, but multiply it by 16, it's pretty annoying.
Also, my tracks sound like raw tape (maybe worse). Is Dolby C Noise Reduction supposed to WORK, or not? On top of the noisy electronics, there's TONS of tape hiss. Maybe it's the heads. THey're evenly worn, but it's a bit flat. THey have shape, but, you know. a bit of wear.......... I'm very tempted to sell it for a 38, or maybe a 48 or a 58. I'd much rather have 8 good tracks than 16 noisy tracks.
Is there anything that I, the pissed off user that's handy with tools, can do besides sell it, or pay an arm and a leg for 16 tracks worth of gates? I don't want to have to transfer the tracks to a digital domain just to clean them up.

-callie-
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
And just so you don't think i'm crazy...

I paid $450 for the thing.........
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2005
Beck's Avatar
Beck Beck is offline
Analog Partisan Ranger
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,024
Rep Power: 493165
Beck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond repute
The B-16 was Fostex' first foray into the 16 on 1/2". It's not the best of the line, but I wouldn't think it should be that bad. Dolby C is quite effective and preferred by many over dbx.

Someone may have fiddled with it that didn't know what they were doing and set the playback amps too high. Dolby doesn't work right if input and output levels are out of whack.

What kind of tape are you using? Do you have a manual with setup info in it?
__________________
«:: «::B::» «::E::» «::C::» «::K::» ::»

"Where in the hell are the red M&M's?"
~My Lil' Sister, 1976
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
I'm using quantegy 456.

There's no manual. But I took it apart and figured out where the cal tweakers are. Just need a cal tape. That's a possibility. I'm the 3rd or 4th owner, and who knows what the 1st or 2nd owners did w/ calibration.

-callie-
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
Should I set the operating levels to +6? +5? +4? +3?

I know that with DBX, 456 tape needed to operate at +3dB.

What kinda headroom is needed with Dolby C on 456?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-28-2005
Beck's Avatar
Beck Beck is offline
Analog Partisan Ranger
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,024
Rep Power: 493165
Beck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond repute
456 is the right stuff for that machine. Another possibility is that someone reset the unit for a lower output tape, so 0 vu is not as hot as it should be.

Or the heads are so badly worn everything is tweaked to the max.

Here's a link with calibration portions of the B-16 manual. It's a little annoying being in jpg rather than pdf... but hey, it's free.

http://synthetizer-sche.chez.tiscali.fr/listtape.html
__________________
«:: «::B::» «::E::» «::C::» «::K::» ::»

"Where in the hell are the red M&M's?"
~My Lil' Sister, 1976
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
You Rock. thanks. I'll go ahead and get a cal tape and try it out.... wish me luck.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-28-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
Except that I need a test tone generator, and an oscilloscope. I'll have no problem obtaining an oscilloscope, but I don't even know where to start looking for a test tone generator. Looked on ebay, and they were all cheapo telephone repairman things

What's the technical name for an audio test tone generator, and where can I find one? WHo make them?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-28-2005
Reel Recording Reel Recording is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: santa cruz ca.
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 0
Reel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond repute
my B16 is very quiet. Once you get it calibrated, I think you will be very happy with it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-28-2005
Beck's Avatar
Beck Beck is offline
Analog Partisan Ranger
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,024
Rep Power: 493165
Beck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muckelroy
Except that I need a test tone generator, and an oscilloscope. I'll have no problem obtaining an oscilloscope, but I don't even know where to start looking for a test tone generator. Looked on ebay, and they were all cheapo telephone repairman things

What's the technical name for an audio test tone generator, and where can I find one? WHo make them?
Look for the TEAC TO-122A, or the Fostex TT-15 test tone oscillators. I use the Fostex and it works great. I don't have an oscilloscope, just a frequency counter on a good multi-meter -- works like a charm.

Here's a tt-15 currently on ebay.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=7310667558
__________________
«:: «::B::» «::E::» «::C::» «::K::» ::»

"Where in the hell are the red M&M's?"
~My Lil' Sister, 1976

Last edited by Beck; 03-28-2005 at 23:08..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-29-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
Kool. One more question - the instructions in that link up there -- what operating level would that set the machine to? (+3dB, +5dB, +6dB?) The only dB level that I could find thorugh the entire instructions was +1dB, not sure.....

Also, it frequently mentions the use of an external level meter. I have a mixer w/ analog meters. Could I hook it into my mixer's Ext in, and set the meter to monitor the Ext in, and get an accurate level reading?

Thank you so much for your help. I really appreciate it.

-callie-
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-29-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
and........What fluxitivity of calibration tape should I use? +3dB, or Those calibration instructions don't say so. It says to play back the calibration tape, and adjust until the meter reads 0dB.

Depending on if the calibration tape is a +3dB tape, or a +6dB tape, uh, that could be the difference between life and death.

-callie-
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-29-2005
Beck's Avatar
Beck Beck is offline
Analog Partisan Ranger
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,024
Rep Power: 493165
Beck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muckelroy
Kool. One more question - the instructions in that link up there -- what operating level would that set the machine to? (+3dB, +5dB, +6dB?) The only dB level that I could find thorugh the entire instructions was +1dB, not sure.....

Also, it frequently mentions the use of an external level meter. I have a mixer w/ analog meters. Could I hook it into my mixer's Ext in, and set the meter to monitor the Ext in, and get an accurate level reading?

Thank you so much for your help. I really appreciate it.

-callie-
What you want is a meter that measures an absolute value in AC millivolts (mV). I use a Radio Shack multimeter, catalog number 22-811 for $29.99. That meter is right on when measuring the output of my Fostex TT-15 tone oscillator.

Technically you could use a vu meter on a mixer for "close enough" but you would have to be confident that it is calibrated correctly (not usually). Also, depending on the brand of mixer the meter they use could be good quality or not so good. Calibrating a mixer to a tape machine is a separate operation to be completed after the tape deck is set to spec.

The + 1dB in the B-16 link is referring to the acceptable range of deviation (plus or minus 1 dB). It's not referring to tape operating level. An output of 1 kHz @ -10 dBv will read about 316 mV on a multimeter and should show 0 dB on the B-16 bar graph meter.

I'm not sure what the flux level is on the B-16. The E-16 was 320 nWb/m or +5. The A-8 was 250 nWb/m or +3, but I can't say for sure about the B-16. 456 will work either way.

-Tim
__________________
«:: «::B::» «::E::» «::C::» «::K::» ::»

"Where in the hell are the red M&M's?"
~My Lil' Sister, 1976

Last edited by Beck; 03-29-2005 at 17:36..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-31-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
I e-mailed Fostex, and they said that the B-16D requires a test tape of a 320 nWb/m (+5dB) fluxitivity.

That being said, MRL's standard tapes only come in +3 and +6, so I'm just gonna get a +6 one, and adjust accordingly.

-callie-
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-03-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
I Feel Like An Idiot

Turns out the NR switch on the back was set to EXT. I flipped it to INT, and viola. Virtually noiseless recordings. Though I feel like kicking myself in the ass 50 times, i'm still RELIEVED!!!

I'm still gonna calibrate it, though. I've already ordered a multimeter and a cal tape.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-03-2005
Reel Recording Reel Recording is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: santa cruz ca.
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 0
Reel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond reputeReel Recording has a reputation beyond repute
ack!!! I had thought of that, but didn't want to say anything.

Amazing how quiet they are, isn't it! These guys here are always knocking them, but I think they are great!

BTW, I also own a 2inch Otari, and an MS16. So I'm not biased. I just think in the 1/2" format, Fostex got it right.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-03-2005
Beck's Avatar
Beck Beck is offline
Analog Partisan Ranger
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,024
Rep Power: 493165
Beck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muckelroy
Turns out the NR switch on the back was set to EXT. I flipped it to INT, and viola. Virtually noiseless recordings. Though I feel like kicking myself in the ass 50 times, i'm still RELIEVED!!!

I'm still gonna calibrate it, though. I've already ordered a multimeter and a cal tape.
Good deal! Yeah, 50 times seems about right for self-inflicted ass kicking on this one. Sometimes I will even go 75 for a simple switch setting.
__________________
«:: «::B::» «::E::» «::C::» «::K::» ::»

"Where in the hell are the red M&M's?"
~My Lil' Sister, 1976
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-29-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
OK, so after a long hiatus of SCHOOL, I finally started to calibrate this thing.

Turns out there's several calibration tweakers right behind the meters, but the manual mentions even more tweakers, and voltage test points, at which point i was like, what the crap? where are they?

So, I started slicing and dicing the thing, and FINALLY found them. They're in the most inconvenient spot -- ON THE BOTTOM. SO, for those of you who own one of these suckers, here's how to start calibrating them --

Remove the front meter bridge cover, and the control panel with an allen wrench. THey'll dangle, but it's ok. This'll unveil about half of the tweakers.

Then, turn the machine on it's side (or upside down, i guess either way will work), and be sure to align the front face of it on the edge of a desk, CAREFULLY, so that you can still play a tape on the front of it, without the flanges rubbing against anything.

NOW, remove the bottom 4 rubber bumpers, and take off the bottom cover. VIOLA. there they are. Each track card is right there, you've got a few more tweakers, and all of those test points the manual talks about.

That's as far as I've gotten so far. Now I've gotta get some alligator clips for my multimeter, cuz these probes won't cut it.

-callie-
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-02-2005
FALKEN's Avatar
FALKEN FALKEN is offline
*************************
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,956
Rep Power: 66667
FALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond repute
did you make any progress with that?

I have an E-16 that I half assed calibrated.

I also noticed that with 456 hiss is horrible...with GP9 you dont even need the dobly. I am still trying to figure out which is better.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-02-2005
acidwashed acidwashed is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 0
acidwashed is on a distinguished road
thanks for this thread guys. i'm going to be borrowing one of these machines for a few months to work on my lo-fi 'masterpiece'. everything slamming to the tape and work it out in the mix. kind of like the high water marks sound.

i hope there's enough saturation to achieve this.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-02-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
eh...

I dunno about SLAMMING THE TAPE on these machines. The Dolby C kinda keeps everything secure from saturation. You'll have to crank something calibration wise to even come close to achieving tape saturation. If the thing's still factory calibrated, then it's running at +5. If you use a +3 level tape like 406 or 407, you might get some grungy saturation. lol. Could be a good thing or a bad thing. Good luck w/ that.

I got some test clip adapters, but I will let you know when I actually start to tweak this machine. (Finals week. not enough time )

And about using 499/GP9, Not too sure about that. I know that the Fostex electronics aren't meant to be cranked too high, and using 499 tape on a +5 operating level.........yeah it'll give you less noise in the tracks, but seems to me that the sound quality of the actual recording would suffer. You may try calibrating it up to +8, but that may sound terrible. I dunno.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-07-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
I've Calibrated the Dolby Encode (aka Repro level). Since the manual stated the instructions in reference to a +5 cal tape, and I have a +6 cal tape, I set the voltage of each channel NOT at 350mV, but at 400mV, which seems like one step higher. This sound correct?

-callie-


(The reason I added 50 mV, is because as I adjusted the rep level down, each increment on the bar meter seemed to be 50 mV higher, or lower, so I figured, a step up from 350 would be 400.)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-07-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
Holy Crap!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think this thing's running at 30 ips. (?!?!?!) Is it supposed to be that way, or should I just tell the dang capstan to calm down?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-09-2005
Muckelroy's Avatar
Muckelroy Muckelroy is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 514
Rep Power: 1459
Muckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond reputeMuckelroy has a reputation beyond repute
Ok, sorry for ranting, but,

Turns out, the B-16D is indeed a 30-ips-only machine.

Looks like I'm just gonna have to sell the thing and get a 38, 48, 58, TSR-8, or Otari MX-5050 of some type. I cannot afford to run at 30 ips, with the cost of tape and all.

I don't have the cash for 16 tracks of outboard gear anyway, so, 8 tracks will do. I just wanna get rolling, somehow. Thanks for all your guys's help.

And if anybody wants this thing, just gimme a shout. Comes w/ takeup reel. my email is lockhart109@yahoo.com

Last edited by Muckelroy; 05-09-2005 at 23:13..
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-10-2005
FALKEN's Avatar
FALKEN FALKEN is offline
*************************
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,956
Rep Power: 66667
FALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond reputeFALKEN has a reputation beyond repute
that sux dude. good luck!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fostex MR-8 Bobby Vanzandt Fostex Forum 61 11-04-2004 07:30
Fostex 812 Neil Ogilvie Fostex Forum 6 05-13-2003 03:31
First Experience with Fostex: Not Good donovan1968 Fostex Forum 6 03-17-2003 20:43
Recieved The Fostex VF-160 CDR Need Advice!!! Axe4Yahweh Fostex Forum 7 02-16-2003 17:16
Fostex VF-16 into Audiophile? Johnalex Digital Recording & Computers 0 12-04-2002 22:34


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:35.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.