Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > User Forums by Brand > Cubase User Forum


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Steinberg Steinberg News Steinberg Medias Steinberg Tests Steinberg Articles Steinberg User Reviews Steinberg Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2005
Funky_A's Avatar
Funky_A Funky_A is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ter Apel, The Netherlands
Age: 24
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 8
Funky_A has a spectacular aura aboutFunky_A has a spectacular aura aboutFunky_A has a spectacular aura about
Cubase SX vs Cubase SL

Hello,

I've now been doing hobby recording me and my band for a couple of months now.
I have some nice gear, and now I am finally at a point where I'd like to buy a REAL version of Cubase.

But offcourse as any good software, you have to pay a lot.
So I noticed Cubase SL, is sort of the same, but misses a few features in it.
But I actually don't know what the BIG difference between the 2 is that, SL is half the price of SX.

Anyway, if someone can advice me to or by SL or save up for SX or buy another program let me know please.

Thank you,
Geert

(I'm Mac all the way, so now PC crap please )
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2005
fluxburn's Avatar
fluxburn fluxburn is offline
production junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Jose
Age: 27
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 7
fluxburn is on a distinguished road
cubase sx2.0 sells used on ebay for $100. If you super bad want sx3 you can upgrade for $150 so that is cubase sx3 for $250 or cubase sx2 for $100

and ps, I use sx and don't even know if I use all the features of sx, most likely you get by with sl, but at the prices I post above who cares.

You can also buy sx and sl new for ~$400 at www.AcademicSuperstore.com if you are a student. That is where I bought mine new... I would have just bought sx1 used if I would have known lol.

Last edited by fluxburn; 03-26-2005 at 13:01..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-26-2005
teddyastuffed teddyastuffed is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: southern california
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 5
teddyastuffed is on a distinguished road
have you looked through the features against the two programs? look at the features and think of what u need (unless u plan on expanding what you do recording wise).

but fluxburn's point on the money factor is pretty understandable. i currently use cubase sx 2.0 and as well dont even know if i use all the features, but i only paid $150 for it and am very content with what i paid for
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-27-2005
Funky_A's Avatar
Funky_A Funky_A is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ter Apel, The Netherlands
Age: 24
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 8
Funky_A has a spectacular aura aboutFunky_A has a spectacular aura aboutFunky_A has a spectacular aura about
Thanks,
I think I need to check with what I gonna use & what not.
I might gonna check that at the shop and ask them about it all the way.
Allthough the 2nd hand SX2 is also a great idea.

Thanks for the replies.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-27-2005
xstatic xstatic is offline
Been Here, Posted That
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 5,235
Rep Power: 156311
xstatic has a reputation beyond reputexstatic has a reputation beyond reputexstatic has a reputation beyond reputexstatic has a reputation beyond reputexstatic has a reputation beyond reputexstatic has a reputation beyond reputexstatic has a reputation beyond reputexstatic has a reputation beyond reputexstatic has a reputation beyond reputexstatic has a reputation beyond reputexstatic has a reputation beyond repute
In order to upgrade an older version of Cubase SX to SX3 you would first have to pay the Steinberg registration fee. I can't remember, but I think it is like $50.

SL3 does not have phase reverse on the channels, has 5 (instead of 8) inserts per channel, and will not allow you to use the right click menu on a wav file to process that file with a plug in. Those are some of the differences that I hae discovered, allthough I am sure there are more.

My version of SL3 will be up for sale soon when my SX3 gets here.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2005
Funky_A's Avatar
Funky_A Funky_A is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ter Apel, The Netherlands
Age: 24
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 8
Funky_A has a spectacular aura aboutFunky_A has a spectacular aura aboutFunky_A has a spectacular aura about
Thanks for the info.

I just managed to get my hands on a €150 Cubase SX incl. Dongle, Manual etc.etc. and not registrated.

So after that I can buy an upgrade for €150 euro's.

Thanks for the help.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Non-newbie Cubase SX sync issues Taufactor Cubase User Forum 2 08-04-2004 14:24
Building a computer specifically for Cubase from scratch anppilot1 Cubase User Forum 2 10-02-2003 23:42
Argh! Reason & Cubase sync problem. trogdor Digital Recording & Computers 1 09-20-2003 11:08
Cubase SX - problem with SF DirectX plugins MBP2112 Mixing / Mastering 1 09-11-2003 05:28
Using SF DirectX plugins in Cubase SX MBP2112 Cubase User Forum 0 09-11-2003 00:03


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 15:45.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.