Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > Equipment Forums > Microphones


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Microphone Microphone News Microphone Medias Microphone Tests Microphone Articles Microphone User Reviews Microphone Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-11-2005
dolecek1 dolecek1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 0
dolecek1 is an unknown quantity at this point
frequency response

could someone please explain frequenzy response to me, like is 50hz - 150khz better or would be 5hz - 50 khz better? thanks
__________________
Gear:

soundcraft Mixer
m-audio audiophile 24/96
schecter guitars
line6 spider amps

various soft synths

The one plugin that I cant live without:bbe sonic maximizer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-11-2005
MadAudio's Avatar
MadAudio MadAudio is offline
Damned if I do
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: D.C.
Age: 45
Posts: 11,997
Rep Power: 1244112
MadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond repute
The range of human hearing is 20Hz (low) to 20kHz (high), although most humans can't even hear that full range of frequencies. You'd have to be a dog to hear anything higher than 20,000 Hertz!
__________________
Newest endeavor: Playing drums in a live band version of 7 Door Sedan's music.
__________________

"Do yourself a favour just shut up, read up then put up." --muttley600
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-11-2005
Blue Bear Sound's Avatar
Blue Bear Sound Blue Bear Sound is offline
Don't feed the bear......
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 12,897
Rep Power: 215
Blue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by dolecek1
could someone please explain frequenzy response to me, like is 50hz - 150khz better or would be 5hz - 50 khz better? thanks
In that specific case there's no way to tell, because you haven't specified a tolerance for the level of deviation from the ideal flat-response curve.

Meaning - a unit having 5-50Khz that is flat within 1-2dB in that region, will likely be better than a unit having a 5-150Khz ± 10dB....

Also - you have to take specifications with a grain of salt because often, it's the marketing department that publishes them and not the engineering team!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-11-2005
DJL DJL is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 6,789
Rep Power: 0
DJL is a name known to allDJL is a name known to allDJL is a name known to allDJL is a name known to allDJL is a name known to allDJL is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by dolecek1
could someone please explain frequenzy response to me, like is 50hz - 150khz better or would be 5hz - 50 khz better? thanks
It depends on what you want the mic for. Like for example... if you're buying a mic for a specific instrument (like kick or vocals). Or another example... if you don't want the mic picking up a certain instrument in the room while recording something else, it might be better to use a mic that cuts or rolls off that freq (i.e. like when you don't want a drum bleeding onto a cymbal track, and etc).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-11-2005
dolecek1 dolecek1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 0
dolecek1 is an unknown quantity at this point
im gonna be using the mic for vocals the reason i was asking is i have been looking at pre's and thats the range of frequences i saw.I want to understand the specs b4 i buy one.
__________________
Gear:

soundcraft Mixer
m-audio audiophile 24/96
schecter guitars
line6 spider amps

various soft synths

The one plugin that I cant live without:bbe sonic maximizer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-11-2005
DJL DJL is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 6,789
Rep Power: 0
DJL is a name known to allDJL is a name known to allDJL is a name known to allDJL is a name known to allDJL is a name known to allDJL is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by dolecek1
im gonna be using the mic for vocals the reason i was asking is i have been looking at pre's and thats the range of frequences i saw.I want to understand the specs b4 i buy one.
What "50Hz to 150kHz" and "5Hz to 50kHz" mic preamps are you looking at?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-14-2005
dolecek1 dolecek1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 107
Rep Power: 0
dolecek1 is an unknown quantity at this point
actually i was lookign at the behri mic2200
__________________
Gear:

soundcraft Mixer
m-audio audiophile 24/96
schecter guitars
line6 spider amps

various soft synths

The one plugin that I cant live without:bbe sonic maximizer
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-14-2005
Blue Bear Sound's Avatar
Blue Bear Sound Blue Bear Sound is offline
Don't feed the bear......
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 12,897
Rep Power: 215
Blue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by dolecek1
actually i was lookign at the behri mic2200
That would be a terrific example of "spec hype".......
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-14-2005
crazydoc's Avatar
crazydoc crazydoc is offline
Master Baiter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Please forgive me. I don't mean to be a prick, but I guess I am.
Age: 1
Posts: 2,677
Rep Power: 564439
crazydoc has a reputation beyond reputecrazydoc has a reputation beyond reputecrazydoc has a reputation beyond reputecrazydoc has a reputation beyond reputecrazydoc has a reputation beyond reputecrazydoc has a reputation beyond reputecrazydoc has a reputation beyond reputecrazydoc has a reputation beyond reputecrazydoc has a reputation beyond reputecrazydoc has a reputation beyond reputecrazydoc has a reputation beyond repute
You can safely ignore any references to frequency response in any preamp you buy. If it's a good quality unit, the frequency response will be more than adequate for the job. If it's a low end unit, any claims about frequency response will likely be bullshit.

The frequency range of human hearing, as mentioned above, is considered to be 20Hz to 20,000 Hz at best (measured in young girls), and in most of us is considerably worse. Although there is controversy regarding the sonic effects on human hearing of frequencies outside this range, for practical purposes claims outside this range can be ignored.

As in all things audio, you need to listen to the gear to see if you like it - specs can't tell you much of the story.
__________________
I'm going through a difficult period - it's called life
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-14-2005
acorec's Avatar
acorec acorec is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Natick, Ma (Nearer to Boston)
Posts: 1,790
Rep Power: 0
acorec has a spectacular aura aboutacorec has a spectacular aura aboutacorec has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Bear Sound
That would be a terrific example of "spec hype".......
No, that would be a fantastic example of ..........say......0-60Hz (hum) being most prevalent.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-14-2005
chessrock's Avatar
chessrock chessrock is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 39
Posts: 11,863
Rep Power: 0
chessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond reputechessrock has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazydoc
The frequency range of human hearing, as mentioned above, is considered to be 20Hz to 20,000 Hz at best (measured in young girls ...
I like young girls.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-14-2005
mcolling mcolling is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Victoria, BC
Age: 27
Posts: 292
Rep Power: 9
mcolling is just really nicemcolling is just really nicemcolling is just really nicemcolling is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by chessrock
I like young girls.
whoa, lets keep the pedophelia to a minimum! or do you mean that you like them for their superior range of hearing??
__________________
A postmodern theory of audio engineering: Polyvocality of incommensurable mic-positions as a method of Behringer emancipation.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Headset with Wide Frequency Response (for Digital Piano P120) washingtonhtsny Keyboards and Sound Modules 7 03-13-2005 23:33
Audiophile 2496 Frequency Response Problem Autist Digital Recording & Computers 6 03-08-2005 17:29
frequency response mrbung1e Digital Recording & Computers 2 06-28-2004 07:48
SM57 & SM58: Difference in frequency response curve! fiveyearslater Microphones 68 06-26-2004 14:36
Frequency response question for Harvey Gerst or other audio engineering expert Kelly Dueck Microphones 6 06-20-2001 23:01


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 22:24.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.