![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cubase LE or
I was thinking about buying the Firepod and getting the LE version of Cubase, or buying a different interface (thought about the MOTU HD) and buying the full version of Cubase SX. What would I be missing with the LE? Just getting started with this digital recording and gonna build a computer aournd what i buy. do you guys suggest either or another?
I am planning on recording my metal band and eventually moving on to all music styles recording. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
it goes Cubase LE Cubase SE Cubase SL, 1,2 OR 3 Cubase SX, 1,2 OR 3 Hope that helps
__________________
Carter MCF Productions |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
What do you mean I won't miss a thing? I will get all the features of SX if I buy the Firepod and get the LE version? Can LE be upgraded to SX?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd use ntracks.
__________________
The fabulous Naiant Mics, perfect for acoustic instruments!
If you don't have DavidK's CD, you are a loser. My tunes. Thanks! ![]() NB DA BEARS! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
and yes you can upgrade to SX from LE. Hope that helps out!
__________________
Carter MCF Productions |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
LE and/or SE (they are the same thing) has about 80% of the features of the full-blown version. There are charts on the steinberg site comparing the versions.
You can upgrade but it comes out to the same as buying SX from a discount mail-order anyway... you won't save any money. I switched over to SE while going through some NTrack 3-to-4upgrade teething problems (mostly solved now; it's also a great recording program) and you can't go wrong with starting out with SE/LE. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
LE isn't SE
Quote:
LE is actually a lighter version than SE -- check out this chart for comparisons. I use LE and it's been fine, but I will definitely be upgrading. LE only comes with 2 inserts and 4 sends per channel and it's limiting sometimes. http://www.steinberg.net/WebVideo/cubasesystem4/English(UK)/doc/Cubase%20Syste Keith |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just got my Firebox last weekend and I recorded a song using Cubase LE. Compared to SX I think sound wise it isn't any different. I have used a not so legal version of SX which has been wiped away from my computer so I am aware of what features are not in the LE version. I missed the extended mixer views, the additional plugins, and the amount of effects per channel but I don't miss the guilt. There are plenty of good free plugins that will make up for what's missing.
I will gladly use my limited but legal copy of LE in place of a bootleg SX. I most likely will upgrade within a year but LE seems to do the job just fine for what I record.
__________________
I lost my pants in the fountain. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thank you for clarifing that, I posted it earlier in this thread. Heres a better link for the comparison.. http://www.steinberg.net/displaydoc_...id=&loc=doc181
__________________
Carter MCF Productions |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Non-newbie Cubase SX sync issues | Taufactor | Cubase User Forum | 2 | 08-04-2004 14:24 |
| Building a computer specifically for Cubase from scratch | anppilot1 | Cubase User Forum | 2 | 10-02-2003 23:42 |
| Argh! Reason & Cubase sync problem. | trogdor | Digital Recording & Computers | 1 | 09-20-2003 11:08 |
| Cubase SX - problem with SF DirectX plugins | MBP2112 | Mixing / Mastering | 1 | 09-11-2003 05:28 |
| Using SF DirectX plugins in Cubase SX | MBP2112 | Cubase User Forum | 0 | 09-11-2003 00:03 |