![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
compression/normalization
Does anyone ever use compression + normalization for vocals? Between the two, I hear better results fr normalization. thanks
__________________
Paresh |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Normalization is nothing more than an automatic gain setting tool. You get the same results as raising a fader, so I'm not sure why you think it's "better"........
__________________
bruce valeriani recording articles http://www.bluebearsound.com/images/bb_siglogo.jpg |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
As Bruce and Scrubs mentioned, the reason why you feel normalization is probably sounding better is that possibly you are not using gain makeup in the compressor, but just cutting down on the dynamic range.
The pupose of the compressor (at least the usual purpose) is to reduce the dynamic range by lowering the level of the audio by a set ratio and threshold. By doing that you can raise the overall volume to create a track with an overall louder average (RMS). This is where you need "gain makeup" to makeup the difference between the original signal and the compressed signal. With normalization (in the traditional sense) the software goes through the entire track finding the loudest value. If it's less than 0 dbFS (digital peak) it will raise the volume of the audio so that the entire track is raised proportionally to get as close to the peak as you tell it to. This does not decrease the dynamic range, but as Bruce mentioned just raised the volume of the track by the preset amount. If later you decide the vocal are too loud and reduced the volume you acomplished nothing other than to add distortion to your track. Now if you're saying that you don't like the sound of compresion, that's an entirely different topic I'll need my third cup of coffee of the day for ...
__________________
Tom Volpicelli The Mastering House Inc. www.masteringhouse.com MySpace: www.myspace.com/masteringhouse |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think it's about time the function of "normalization" be taken out of all digital editing systems.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
After all, a screwdriver or hammer could be considered pretty useless until you know what/how they're used!
__________________
bruce valeriani recording articles http://www.bluebearsound.com/images/bb_siglogo.jpg |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
"Sure" I say, "but I have to charge you for an hours block." "thats ok", he replies. I ask "do you have pretracked mixes that you need normalized?" "pre tracked?!?!?!" he replies "I like the distortion effect on it" After much discussion about what the f*** he was talkin about, I came to realize that he did in fact have a normaliser, set 10 times too high, so it constantly clipped everything.
__________________
when the dust all settles and all of us have gone our life ways, the only thing anybody will care about in those recordings is the content. The songs and how they are performed. - SouthSIDE Glen |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Wayne
__________________
Monitoring at CathouseSound AetherAudio 'Continuum A.D. and TimePiece 'Mini (formerly S.P. Technology |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lemmingizing....... I like it!!!
![]()
__________________
bruce valeriani recording articles http://www.bluebearsound.com/images/bb_siglogo.jpg |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
The only use I've had for normalization is ages ago making keyboard samples.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There are also other types of normalization that behave differently and act more like limiters and compressors. For example the Finalizer has a "normalization"' function that works this way and Sound Forge I believe also has as similar normalization function that will allow you to automatically set the RMS level.
__________________
Tom Volpicelli The Mastering House Inc. www.masteringhouse.com MySpace: www.myspace.com/masteringhouse |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|