Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > User Forums by Brand > Cool Edit Pro / Adobe Audition Forum


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Music-software Music-software News Music-software Medias Music-software Tests Music-software Articles Music-software User Reviews Music-software Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2005
themaddog themaddog is offline
Rockin' & Rollin'
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nahant, MA
Age: 26
Posts: 689
Rep Power: 15024
themaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond repute
Best file format

Hi,
Does anyone have any idea on what the best file format is for recording on Cool Edit Pro 2.0? I've used .wav in the past, but heard that's not the best. Space is not an issue, and I'm recording at 24-bit/96.6 khz.

Thank you,
-MD
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-13-2005
dobro dobro is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,274
Rep Power: 131176
dobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond repute
I think most people save in Windows PCM format.

If you've heard that's not the best, then what is?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-13-2005
themaddog themaddog is offline
Rockin' & Rollin'
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nahant, MA
Age: 26
Posts: 689
Rep Power: 15024
themaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond repute
My cousin, who is currently majoring in video and media editing told me that .aif is the standard format and that he was taught that this was better than .wav, which was the old standard. He couldn't tell me why, and I don't know enough about digital recording to argue one way or the other.

-MD
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-13-2005
lpdeluxe's Avatar
lpdeluxe lpdeluxe is offline
The Precision Bass Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: deep East Texas
Posts: 2,808
Rep Power: 544952
lpdeluxe has a reputation beyond reputelpdeluxe has a reputation beyond reputelpdeluxe has a reputation beyond reputelpdeluxe has a reputation beyond reputelpdeluxe has a reputation beyond reputelpdeluxe has a reputation beyond reputelpdeluxe has a reputation beyond reputelpdeluxe has a reputation beyond reputelpdeluxe has a reputation beyond reputelpdeluxe has a reputation beyond reputelpdeluxe has a reputation beyond repute
he was taught that this was better

Probably the reason he couldn't tell you was that he was told that with no explanation. It sounds like somebody has learned on one format and is unfamiiliar with the others. Maybe they have software that only handles one format. It would make sense to say that one format works better than another for a particular use. For example, with graphics, you have the choice of nearly as many formats as for audio. Some compress the data, some don't, some change the colors, others don't. For myself, I use mostly 3...but others, who might be more into animation, or synching sounds, might prefer 3 different ones. That doesn't mean one is "better", but only more appropriate. Personally I use pcm .wav because it translates very quickly to CDR. It is also uncompressed, and maybe somebody else doesn't like it because they need a compressed format. Who knows? It would be interesting to see some logic applied to the assertion. In the meantime, I don't expect to change based on the discussion so far.
__________________
"Digo: 'paciencia, y barajar.'" -- Don Quijote de la Mancha, Part II, Chapter 23
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-13-2005
MadAudio's Avatar
MadAudio MadAudio is offline
Damned if I do
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: D.C.
Age: 45
Posts: 11,997
Rep Power: 1244112
MadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond repute
It was my understanding that .aiff and .wav are virtually the same quality-wise.
__________________
Newest endeavor: Playing drums in a live band version of 7 Door Sedan's music.
__________________

"Do yourself a favour just shut up, read up then put up." --muttley600
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-13-2005
trigger's Avatar
trigger trigger is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 0
trigger is infamous around these partstrigger is infamous around these partstrigger is infamous around these partstrigger is infamous around these partstrigger is infamous around these partstrigger is infamous around these partstrigger is infamous around these partstrigger is infamous around these partstrigger is infamous around these partstrigger is infamous around these partstrigger is infamous around these parts
Audio Interchange File Format (or AIFF) is a file format for storing digital audio (waveform) data. It supports a variety of bit resolutions, sample rates, and channels of audio.

This format is very popular upon Apple platforms, and is widely used in professional programs that process digital audio waveforms.

The PCM wav format is the popular Windows platform version and is widely used in professional programs that process digital audio waveforms.

AIFF files are similar to Windows WAVE files in both size and quality. Both AIFF and WAVE files can hold CD quality audio and therefore can be burned onto an audio CD.

Both formats are uncompressed.

Now educate your cousin, he's wrong.

__________________
For your sweet top lip I'm in the queue
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-13-2005
Change of POETS's Avatar
Change of POETS Change of POETS is offline
Boom Bap
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Age: 31
Posts: 1,573
Rep Power: 8908
Change of POETS has a reputation beyond reputeChange of POETS has a reputation beyond reputeChange of POETS has a reputation beyond reputeChange of POETS has a reputation beyond reputeChange of POETS has a reputation beyond reputeChange of POETS has a reputation beyond reputeChange of POETS has a reputation beyond reputeChange of POETS has a reputation beyond reputeChange of POETS has a reputation beyond reputeChange of POETS has a reputation beyond reputeChange of POETS has a reputation beyond repute
Regardless of which format you use, you'll still end up with a 16 bit recording.
__________________
http://www.changehiphop.com/images/pics/Signature.jpg
Preview of the new Album here!!!
Mixing and Mastering services for your project, contact change@changehiphop.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-14-2005
themaddog themaddog is offline
Rockin' & Rollin'
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Nahant, MA
Age: 26
Posts: 689
Rep Power: 15024
themaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond reputethemaddog has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Change of POETS
Regardless of which format you use, you'll still end up with a 16 bit recording.
Even if I record at 24-bit, and save it at 32-bit?

-MD
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-14-2005
Wireneck's Avatar
Wireneck Wireneck is offline
Fretboard Acrobat
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Age: 27
Posts: 1,746
Rep Power: 295660
Wireneck has a reputation beyond reputeWireneck has a reputation beyond reputeWireneck has a reputation beyond reputeWireneck has a reputation beyond reputeWireneck has a reputation beyond reputeWireneck has a reputation beyond reputeWireneck has a reputation beyond reputeWireneck has a reputation beyond reputeWireneck has a reputation beyond reputeWireneck has a reputation beyond reputeWireneck has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Even if I record at 24-bit, and save it at 32-bit?
Yep audio cd's are 16 bit...................
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-14-2005
stoctony's Avatar
stoctony stoctony is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Texas/Very South
Age: 31
Posts: 218
Rep Power: 6
stoctony is on a distinguished road
So does that mean there is no reason to record any greater than 16 bit if your putting it on a CD
__________________
Growing old is Manditory
Growing up is Optional
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-14-2005
MadAudio's Avatar
MadAudio MadAudio is offline
Damned if I do
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: D.C.
Age: 45
Posts: 11,997
Rep Power: 1244112
MadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond reputeMadAudio has a reputation beyond repute
NO! While 16-bit is the final CD format, the better reolution your recording is, the better it will sound.
__________________
Newest endeavor: Playing drums in a live band version of 7 Door Sedan's music.
__________________

"Do yourself a favour just shut up, read up then put up." --muttley600
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-15-2005
Tukkis's Avatar
Tukkis Tukkis is offline
The Wonder From Downunder
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Age: 22
Posts: 729
Rep Power: 49
Tukkis has a reputation beyond reputeTukkis has a reputation beyond reputeTukkis has a reputation beyond reputeTukkis has a reputation beyond reputeTukkis has a reputation beyond reputeTukkis has a reputation beyond reputeTukkis has a reputation beyond reputeTukkis has a reputation beyond reputeTukkis has a reputation beyond reputeTukkis has a reputation beyond reputeTukkis has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
So does that mean there is no reason to record any greater than 16 bit if your putting it on a CD
Basically without going into too much detail, record and process everything at 24 or 32 bit and convert at the very last stage to 16bit just before CD.

Tukkis
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Instrument Definiton File: Ensoniq KS32? miller325 Cakewalk / Sonar Forum 3 03-03-2008 17:48
Microsoft Bulitin - A MIDI file can hack your computer RWhite Digital Recording & Computers 9 07-25-2003 06:14
broadcast wave or riff wave? mojew Cakewalk / Sonar Forum 18 06-24-2003 10:42
Collaborations, a discussion on logistics Guernica MP3 Mixing Clinic 79 02-09-2003 15:17
defraging so slow... Rusty K Digital Recording & Computers 8 04-12-2001 14:42


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 23:42.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.