![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey guys- i am in the process of buying my first analogue machine and can't decide between a tascam 38 apparently in good condition for AU$450 (that's about $320US) or a Tascam ATR 60 1/2 inch 8 track also in Ok condition for AU$800 (about $570US). They are both 1/2 inch 8 track units, the 38 has the old 3 band EQ that i have used on an old desk - it's pretty crunchy but ok for guitars and bass. but i don't know much about the atr-60 , and i figure it's probably a bit tougher to maintain . any thoughts??
by the way, the 38 comes with a few reels cheers |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hey Jerome.
Either unit would be a good choice if it's in good condition (and for those prices you'd be getting a bargain, whichever one you chose). I'd personally go for the ATR-60 myself, simply because it was the later model and is therefore more likely to be found in good condition. Not that the 38 would be a bad choice. One thing that confuses me about your post, though, is this Quote:
)
__________________
Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital recording is a pretty neat idea. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 38 was a decent machine for the semi-pro, small project, home and hobbiest market,... although 1/2"-8-track is a great sounding format, almost any way you slice it. The 38 is a fine choice, for most home recording purposes.
I agree with Mark, that your details seem a bit misleading. The 38 has NO EQ, and it's the 388 that has a mixer-integrated-reel-recorder design, and indeed does have 3-band EQ. The 388, however, would be 8-tracks on 1/4" tape, not 1/2". The 388 is a fine machine, on it's own merits, but it's quite a different platform than either the 38 or ATR-60/8. Good luck. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks guys - yeah, i think i was a bit mixed up. i was also looking at a 388 a few weeks back and must thought the 38 had the eq. anyway - looks like the atr-60 is the winner so far
cheers |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The ATR60-8 is a very well built, professional machine and basically has the same transport, electronics and head design level as the MS16. It is not as portable a machine as the 38 but it does offer more options and has a much better RTZ and STC functionality.
If you can find a low mileage one for a good price, I would grab it! Cheers! ![]() |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|