Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Mixing / Mastering


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2004
Alexbt's Avatar
Alexbt Alexbt is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Riverside, RI USA
Posts: 608
Rep Power: 544
Alexbt has a reputation beyond reputeAlexbt has a reputation beyond reputeAlexbt has a reputation beyond reputeAlexbt has a reputation beyond reputeAlexbt has a reputation beyond reputeAlexbt has a reputation beyond reputeAlexbt has a reputation beyond reputeAlexbt has a reputation beyond reputeAlexbt has a reputation beyond reputeAlexbt has a reputation beyond reputeAlexbt has a reputation beyond repute
Mastering Live Recordings

Ok! Now that I know what mastering is specifically (what I thought it was)... on to my next question!

I have some live recordings of my band that I've been trying to master.

For recording in general on my Macs, I've been using BIAS Deck 2.5 & 3.0 (Depending on which machine I use, as both get the recording done, but 2.5 tends to be faster and less memory/processor intensive)

In 3.0, I have been running my files through a processing effect called mda Stereo which does a decent job of making my mono audio tracks listenable, though they still need EQ work.

I have read that one program used for mastering is BIAS Peak, which is a Mac program.

Are there any other recommended Mac mastering programs, and also are there any other suggestions for mastering live mono recordings?
(We asked the sound guy for a stereo mix or something we could work with but we ended up with two channels of mono, the right side being at a lower volume than the left)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2004
masteringhouse's Avatar
masteringhouse masteringhouse is offline
www.masteringhouse.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Philadelphia Metropolitan Area
Age: 52
Posts: 2,029
Rep Power: 218750
masteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond repute
I've done quite a bit of mastering for live recordings for King Biscuit (U2, The Who, The Rolling Stones, Clapton, etc.)

I'd have to say that you're pretty well screwed with a mono recording. There are ways to acheive pseudo-stereo such as using comb filtering, and psychoacoutic processing, but they all suck in comparison to recording correctly in stereo. Personally I would re-record.

If you do want to play around though here's a decent article to start with:

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/oct0.../stereomix.htm
__________________
Tom Volpicelli
The Mastering House Inc.
www.masteringhouse.com

MySpace:
www.myspace.com/masteringhouse
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2004
Blue Bear Sound's Avatar
Blue Bear Sound Blue Bear Sound is offline
Don't feed the bear......
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 12,897
Rep Power: 215
Blue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond repute
I think a decent mono recording is much better than a mono recording converted to pseudo-stereo.......
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-20-2004
masteringhouse's Avatar
masteringhouse masteringhouse is offline
www.masteringhouse.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Philadelphia Metropolitan Area
Age: 52
Posts: 2,029
Rep Power: 218750
masteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond reputemasteringhouse has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Bear Sound
I think a decent mono recording is much better than a mono recording converted to pseudo-stereo.......
In general I agree (though I've heard some classical recordings done this way with good results).

Phase issues become pretty important with regards to pseudo-stereo. If it isn't mono-compatible after processing then you're not doing it correctly.

Lots of Beatles and Beach Boys stuff sounds great in mono. Unless you're going for that vintage type of sound though your better off re-recording.
__________________
Tom Volpicelli
The Mastering House Inc.
www.masteringhouse.com

MySpace:
www.myspace.com/masteringhouse
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 19:21.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.