Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > User Forums by Brand > Cakewalk / Sonar Forum


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Cakewalk Cakewalk News Cakewalk Medias Cakewalk Tests Cakewalk Articles Cakewalk User Reviews Cakewalk Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-01-2004
Qwerty's Avatar
Qwerty Qwerty is offline
1K Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,336
Rep Power: 26417
Qwerty has a reputation beyond reputeQwerty has a reputation beyond reputeQwerty has a reputation beyond reputeQwerty has a reputation beyond reputeQwerty has a reputation beyond reputeQwerty has a reputation beyond reputeQwerty has a reputation beyond reputeQwerty has a reputation beyond reputeQwerty has a reputation beyond reputeQwerty has a reputation beyond reputeQwerty has a reputation beyond repute
Sonar 4: Configurable Panning Law

Whenever we get down and dirty and have one of "those" discussions about sound quality of various sequencers, the topic of 'Panning Law' always raises its head. Ron Kuper, one of the lead tech. guys at Cakewalk, explained that all sequencers will pump out identical information whilst summing and that differences come into account due to differing standards and application of 'Panning Law' between sequencers.

So, Sonar 4 P.E. has just been announced with six configurable options for Panning Law.

Does anyone have a handle on what laws are applied with other sequencers? Does anyone have any idea as to how the application of these different panning laws would impact themselves upon a mix?

Q.
__________________
<insert something witty here>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2004
dachay2tnr's Avatar
dachay2tnr dachay2tnr is offline
One Hit Wonder
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Da Garden State
Posts: 5,140
Rep Power: 786020
dachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond reputedachay2tnr has a reputation beyond repute
I don't know all six versions, but the general theory is that when something is panned directly center it will be about 3 db louder than when it is panned full left or full right. I assume this has to do with the same signal being pumped out of two speakers rather than just one.

Cakewalk's panning algorithm has always compensated for this. IOW, when you pan something center the volume is attenuated by 3db (and, I assume by relative amounts inbetween center and 100%). Therefore, if you were to slowly pan a signal from full left to full right you would not encounter any changes in volume.

Obviously, if you were to take a mix and play it back in a multi-track program that did not use the same panning algorithms, many of the instruments/voices would be louder or softer in the mix than they would be in Cakewalk - depending on where in the mix they were panned.

Personally I am comfortable with the way Cakewalk has approached this in the past, and I think this new feature is simply a knee-jerk reaction to people saying the "mix sounds better in Nuendo (or, whatever your favorite multi-track software is)." Now Cakwalk can say, change the panning algorithm to match Nuendo's, and the mix will sound the same.

I like the fact that I can move an instrument in a mix and not have to worry about readjusting the volume setting for that instrument.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 17:15.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.