Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mfsn
Yes, I agree. But think about a song like Yellow Submarine where the Beatles have separated voice (L) from instruments (R). In a large room I could use the same (L) and (R) stereo source but reverse their outputs to the surround channels and make a listener on the right hear "the same sound" as another on the right side of the room. I could also play with volume levels to enhance portions of the song on the center channel only when the lead singer is singing and to increase the volume on the surround channels only during backing vocals/chorus portions of the song. I just would like to play a little with these kind of things...
|
I think I understand where you're going with this, and I urge you to try it if you want to. I'd be interested to hear it myself. I just want to bring light on a few things about surround first before you venture into it. First, I think you really won't hear much dramatic differences by flipping the LR and putting them in the rear. Mainly 'cause if someone is facing forward, the Right channel will be coming from the right and from behind them which I think could annoy some people. I've always had qualms with surround mixing for music like SACD or DVD...mainly because I see mixing music as trying to recreate a live concert, like the band is right there. But when listening to a concert or a band, generally they are not surrounding you. The bass player, guitarist, drummer...they're all in front of you and not behind. More channels of speakers doesn't always mean a better sound. Especially from an album that was mixed orginally for stereo (like the Beatles one...which is probably already mixed to perfection anyway). I think really the only effect you will get with more speakers is just a louder sound. Also, you might run into phasing problems...although, if anyone here thinks I'm wrong on that correct me, I'm not 100% on that since I haven't tried running the same sound behind you as in front of you. Good luck though.