Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Recording Techniques


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Homestudio Homestudio News Homestudio Medias Homestudio Tests Homestudio Articles Homestudio User Reviews Homestudio Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2004
gitRhero gitRhero is offline
3 chord wonders
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 0
gitRhero has a spectacular aura aboutgitRhero has a spectacular aura about
Spliting a recording into hi mid low

I'm working on cleaning up some old cassete recordings and I read somewhere it's a good idea to split the recording up into lows mids and highs so it's easier to work with.
My question is what would the best frequency range be for the lows mids and hi's?
e.g.
lows o-500
mids 500-6000
highs 6000-inf
Something like that? What would be the best place to split the frequencies?

Hope this ? makes sence...
Thanx J
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2004
Blue Bear Sound's Avatar
Blue Bear Sound Blue Bear Sound is offline
Don't feed the bear......
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 12,897
Rep Power: 215
Blue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond repute
How long is a piece of string?

There's no way to answer that, as it will depend entirely on the frequency distribution of the material you're trying to "rescue".....

In other words - there's no way around the fact that it's context-sensitive so you have to use your ears!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2004
mshilarious's Avatar
mshilarious mshilarious is offline
Faithful Departed
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: OBX, NC
Posts: 9,332
Rep Power: 2113196
mshilarious has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by gitRhero
I'm working on cleaning up some old cassete recordings and I read somewhere it's a good idea to split the recording up into lows mids and highs so it's easier to work with.
Sadly I've had to do a lot of that. Ah, those good ol' days of boombox recording.

What I did is use a parametric EQ to help identify problem frequencies. Crank it all the way up and then sweep until you find the frequencies that are the problem. Then split in between those frequencies. A combo of narrow deep cuts on those frequencies and judicious use of compression on each band does the trick.

This is kind of a brutal technique so I save it for rescue missions.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2004
gitRhero gitRhero is offline
3 chord wonders
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 0
gitRhero has a spectacular aura aboutgitRhero has a spectacular aura about
Thanx for the replys guys not sure if you understand my question though.
What I'm talking about is making 3 seperate tks of the recording
one containing only the low end, one the mid range and one the highs...
I've been doing this by using a low pass at say 500, so all I have left is the low end, that would be saved as trk 1
then a hi-pass at 500 and a low-pass at say 6k for trk 2
then a hi-pass at 6k for trk 3
Then I would have 3 seperate trks on the mixer ready for EQ and other treatment.
That way for example you can compress the bass, kick etc without effecting the mid/hi range.
I guess if I experiment enought I'll find the best frequency is range for each trk.
Maybe I should just ask it like this, what is considerd low end 0-500?? Mids 500-6k?? 500-3k??
Hi's 3k-inf 6k-inf??? 10k-???

Thanx
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2004
Massive Master's Avatar
Massive Master Massive Master is offline
MASSIVE Mastering, LLC
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago area, probably looking for more coffee.
Age: 42
Posts: 5,385
Rep Power: 1294717
Massive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond reputeMassive Master has a reputation beyond repute
Starting points -

Top of the lows - 100-150

Top of the mids - 2-3k

Top of the highs - Whatever the top is.

Again - Those are just starting points... As mentioned, it's a VERY context-sensitive operation.

Or, just use a multi-band compressor (same starting points apply).
__________________
John Scrip - MASSIVE Mastering


Spoon-feed a newbie the answer and he'll mix for a day --
Spark his curiosity to find the answer himself and he'll mix for a lifetime...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2004
protein's Avatar
protein protein is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reading, UK
Age: 32
Posts: 219
Rep Power: 6
protein is on a distinguished road
Wouldn't a multi band compressor do the trick?
__________________
www.myspace.com/doesitoffendyou
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 21:46.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.