Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > User Forums by Brand > TASCAM User Forum


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Tascam Tascam News Tascam Medias Tascam Tests Tascam Articles Tascam User Reviews Tascam Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2004
Be Loveless's Avatar
Be Loveless Be Loveless is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 34
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 20
Be Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud of
Who else records guitar direct.

I'm almost always dissapointed when I mic my cabinent. I seem to always get better cleaner more usable results by using the line out on my amp into my mixer. Anyone else feel the same way? By the way I almost always play super clean.
__________________
The BLUE HUMOURS
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2004
Beck's Avatar
Beck Beck is offline
Analog Partisan Ranger
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,024
Rep Power: 485676
Beck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond repute
I nearly always go direct through a Rockman sustainor model 200 and hughes & Kettner Red Box MKII. Sounds sweet. I haven't fumbled with amps and mics for years when recording. Everyone always asks how I get my guitar tracks so smooth and professional sounding. -- Now you know.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-22-2004
The Ghost of FM's Avatar
The Ghost of FM The Ghost of FM is offline
French Mofo
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Jungles of Canukistan
Age: 48
Posts: 4,473
Rep Power: 3172588
The Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond repute
I haven't mic'ed a guitar cabinet in 15 years!

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-22-2004
Sixstringer Sixstringer is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fredericksburg, VA soon to be not far from NASHVILLE , Tn
Age: 57
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
Sixstringer is on a distinguished road
Cool Help !!!!!

OK now that I got your attention (LOL)....I agree--me-thinks! I've been playing out (part time) for years & now getting into recording. Hear my story...So I get this Beringher (spelling?) AMP that has FX modelling & line out
(So So for gigging but GREAT for recording). Well I LOVE to record, but I also like to be HEARD a little when we gig. THe Old Blue Devil wasn't cuttin it, so I am in the market for a 'more powerful amp'. Problem is after SHOPPING around, testing & listening to on-line reviews, I am as confused as SH&# !!
EXAMPLE, I was looking at the Behringer GMX212 (quality ???), the Fender Stage160(another 212)--almost 6 bills, and the CRATE FXT 212(350 bucks).
The CRATE was VERY IMPRESSIVE, but it doesn't have a line out (nor a headphone Jack). What a shame!!! At least with my old Blue Devil Modelling Amp
I could line out to the TASCAM recorder & get those neat FX (out of the modelling amp) with a CLEAN SOUND. What to do????? DOn't want to buy one AMP for gigging (i.e FXT 212 is decent power/sound/FX--albeit no line out or
Speaker out--although it does have an EXT Speaker out).

Ronnie James
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-22-2004
Beck's Avatar
Beck Beck is offline
Analog Partisan Ranger
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,024
Rep Power: 485676
Beck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond repute
Sixstringer,

Your in luck. If it has an EXT speaker out you can use the Hughes & Kettner Red Box. It is designed to take a speaker out and DI it into a board. It simulates a cabinet and does a great job.

http://www.musiciansfriend.com/srs7/...se_pid/480401/

You can also find them on eBay.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-22-2004
k1enneth k1enneth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hartford, Ct.
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
k1enneth is a jewel in the roughk1enneth is a jewel in the roughk1enneth is a jewel in the roughk1enneth is a jewel in the rough
Not recording direct!

I'm still mike my fender tube amp thru my rinky dink aphex preamp then to my Tascam. It's simple and neanderthal, but I can play clean without any string noise...if that's the kind of clean you want. My amp is too much watts (Deluxe Reverb-22 watts) and believe or not I'm looking to build a Valco-Supro simple 14 watt amp this summer. I'm having a more difficult time of trying to either mike and/or go direct with my bass guitar amp. I can't seem to get the McCartney-Sgt Pepper bass sound onto tape. But who can?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-23-2004
Be Loveless's Avatar
Be Loveless Be Loveless is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 34
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 20
Be Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud of
Good to know I'm not alone. Tell me more about the Red Box Beck.
__________________
The BLUE HUMOURS
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-23-2004
Be Loveless's Avatar
Be Loveless Be Loveless is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 34
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 20
Be Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud of
Oh, k1 I think McCartney's sound had a lot to do with his technique. He would be constantly mute release mute . Like for every freakin note! If you watch closely in old clips you can see it. I think he's kind of a prick but a damn good bass player (once).
__________________
The BLUE HUMOURS
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-25-2004
wildflower soul wildflower soul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 25
Posts: 169
Rep Power: 7
wildflower soul is on a distinguished road
Odd I was just thinking about this very subject earlier. I used to record direct into my computer and got decent results sometimes.


Now that I record on analog.... I mic my cabinet always, it captures the tone of my guitar better. I hate the way sm57's sound on guitar cabinets though even though people swear by them
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-25-2004
Be Loveless's Avatar
Be Loveless Be Loveless is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 34
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 20
Be Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud of
Yeah I think the 57 sounds like poop too. I don't think it was ever intended for clean guitar tones.
__________________
The BLUE HUMOURS
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-26-2004
Beck's Avatar
Beck Beck is offline
Analog Partisan Ranger
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,024
Rep Power: 485676
Beck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Be Loveless
Good to know I'm not alone. Tell me more about the Red Box Beck.
Here's a some links including the manual for the latest version from the Hughes & Kettner site, and an archived page for the older model.

http://www.wicasta.com/music/gear/mk2.html

http://www.hughes-and-kettner.com/fi..._pro_klein.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/200101281.../redboxmk2.htm

There have been four different versions over the years. If looking on eBay for used, anything from the second version (MKII) and later all sound great. They're all built like a tank. The older versions were labeled Red Box "Cabinetulator" which is what I have. The latest version uses no battery, while the earlier ones use a 9-volt battery or adaptor.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-26-2004
Blue Bear Sound's Avatar
Blue Bear Sound Blue Bear Sound is offline
Don't feed the bear......
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 12,897
Rep Power: 215
Blue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Be Loveless
Yeah I think the 57 sounds like poop too. I don't think it was ever intended for clean guitar tones.
I often use a 57 on amps all the time! A 57 on an amp is responsible for many of the classic rock guitar sounds that many are so fond of...

I suspect that along with the room, it's the way you're mic'ing the amps that's the issue....... not to mention also that without a good pre, it's much harder to get dynamics mics to "reveal themselves"...........
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-26-2004
wildflower soul wildflower soul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 25
Posts: 169
Rep Power: 7
wildflower soul is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Bear Sound
I often use a 57 on amps all the time! A 57 on an amp is responsible for many of the classic rock guitar sounds that many are so fond of...

I suspect that along with the room, it's the way you're mic'ing the amps that's the issue....... not to mention also that without a good pre, it's much harder to get dynamics mics to "reveal themselves"...........
nah, they use them 99% of the time on my cabinet at live shows. We borrowed a Sennheiser e609 from some band we played with once and the recording from the board sounded great. Great soundguy too, we've done several board recordings from him and the one with the Sennheiser sounded best.

People rely on their 57's a bit too much. We did a session live on the radio, they were using 2 sm57's overhead on the drums.

I dont think a 57 ever sounds "bad" persay though, just weird sometimes. I just think there are better mics to do the job. For live sound they do the job decent. Although in a studio its my expierience they sound just a tad thin
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-27-2004
Be Loveless's Avatar
Be Loveless Be Loveless is offline
Dedicated Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 34
Posts: 434
Rep Power: 20
Be Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud ofBe Loveless has much to be proud of
Thanks for da links Beck will check them soon. Blue Bear, I use a roland JC-77 (2x10) and yeah my room is small (9x11) and dead (it was either dead or echo ringing, I went for dead) I use a Parker and go for a real clean surf/country ish tone that I can get out of my rig but can't get it into my (don't laugh) tascam 488 with a 57. I've tried all sorts of distances and positions to no avail. What would you suggest with the equipment I have? I just can't seem to find a use for that damn mic on guitar but have strangely enough found uses for it on vocals.
__________________
The BLUE HUMOURS
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:50.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.