Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > Equipment Forums > Microphones


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Microphone Microphone News Microphone Medias Microphone Tests Microphone Articles Microphone User Reviews Microphone Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-25-2004
Paj Paj is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 534
Rep Power: 42618
Paj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond repute
Is the MXL 991 a "GC 603"?

Does anyone know if the MXL 991 is a GC packaged 603? The MXL website is no help.

Thanks,
Paj
8^?
__________________
8^)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-25-2004
apl's Avatar
apl apl is offline
Stand Up Comity
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Agraria, IL
Age: 48
Posts: 5,602
Rep Power: 2392934
apl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond repute
FWIW

Hi, Paj.

Here's an amusing review of an MXL:

http://www.prorec.com/prorec/article...2568AD0072955B

apl
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-25-2004
Harvey Gerst Harvey Gerst is offline
Huh ???
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sanger, TX
Age: 72
Posts: 4,719
Rep Power: 894304
Harvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FWIW

Quote:
Originally posted by apl
Hi, Paj.

Here's an amusing review of an MXL:

http://www.prorec.com/prorec/article...2568AD0072955B

apl
And what does that review have to do with the MXL603 or 991?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-25-2004
apl's Avatar
apl apl is offline
Stand Up Comity
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Agraria, IL
Age: 48
Posts: 5,602
Rep Power: 2392934
apl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond reputeapl has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Re: FWIW

Quote:
Originally posted by Harvey Gerst
And what does that review have to do with the MXL603 or 991?
Nothin' really, 'cept the common brand name. Hence the FWIW subject.

Are you the Gerst someone mentioned in relation to the mic testing technique? Is there a link to that?

Thanks a heap!
__________________
The fabulous Naiant Mics, perfect for acoustic instruments!

If you don't have DavidK's CD, you are a loser.


My tunes. Thanks!
NB
DA BEARS!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-25-2004
ausrock's Avatar
ausrock ausrock is offline
Feeling Monolithic
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Terra Australis
Posts: 3,252
Rep Power: 131117
ausrock has a reputation beyond reputeausrock has a reputation beyond reputeausrock has a reputation beyond reputeausrock has a reputation beyond reputeausrock has a reputation beyond reputeausrock has a reputation beyond reputeausrock has a reputation beyond reputeausrock has a reputation beyond reputeausrock has a reputation beyond reputeausrock has a reputation beyond reputeausrock has a reputation beyond repute
ROFLMGDFAO.............................






Sorry Harvey.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-25-2004
Harvey Gerst Harvey Gerst is offline
Huh ???
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sanger, TX
Age: 72
Posts: 4,719
Rep Power: 894304
Harvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond reputeHarvey Gerst has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Re: Re: FWIW

Quote:
Originally posted by apl
Nothin' really, 'cept the common brand name. Hence the FWIW subject.

Are you the Gerst someone mentioned in relation to the mic testing technique? Is there a link to that?

Thanks a heap!
Nope, no relation, but it does get confusing at times.

This is probably the thread you're looking for:

http://homerecording.com/bbs//showth...threadid=38175
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-25-2004
Paj Paj is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 534
Rep Power: 42618
Paj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond repute
Question I repeat: Is the MXL 991 a repackaged GC 603?

All:

I thank you for your replies, and I love this forum, but before everybody goes way off-topic (imagine that happening around here):

The MXL 991 is currently being sold as part of a MXL990 & 991 package deal.

Does anybody know if the Guitar Center MXL991 is the same mic as the 603?

Thanks,
Paj
8^?


P.S.: Please, H.G.---I tought that you'd be able to clear it up, if anybody could.
__________________
8^)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-25-2004
Middleman's Avatar
Middleman Middleman is offline
Professional Amateur
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 2,874
Rep Power: 9529
Middleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond repute
I had reported elsewhere that the 603 and the 991 were the same mic but now I have my doubts. I have the 991 and the freq. chart is entirely different than either the 600 or the 603. In fact, it is flatter across the board than either mic with a slight rise, but still flat, from 2K to 10K. It rises dramatically above this point.

So, it looks like we have a whole new animal here. I tried it out on acoustic before buying and it sounds excellent by the way.

I just checked again and the Freq Range is the same as the 600 (3Hz-20KHz the 603 is 20Hz to 25Hz) but it has a better S/N Ratio coming in at 80db vs the 600 at 74db. It also is heavier (more electronics) than the 600.

The 600 and the 603 are super cardiod and the 991 is just cardoid. The 991 has lower equivalent noise then the 603 but the same as the 600 at 18db.

The weight is the real giveaway. Either the capsule is heavier or there are more electronics going on in the 991. The 603 is 128g the 600 is 130g but the 991 is 220G, a significant jump. As the capsules appear the same as the other two I might speculate that the electronics are beefier. I don't have one of the others to rip apart and compare however.

Last edited by Middleman; 04-25-2004 at 11:10..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-25-2004
Paj Paj is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 534
Rep Power: 42618
Paj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond repute
Middleman: Thanks!

Middleman:

Thanks! That's the ***t I was looking for! The personal experience/anecdote was really appreciated. I sometimes think my 603's are a tad hyped in the upper freqs, and at the GC price, the 991 seems worth a try (God, save me from this GAS. . .).

I like the "mass analysis" (but nearly doubling the mass suggests to me a different metal in the tube rather than more electronics).

Thanks for taking the time to respond.

Later,
Paj
8^)
__________________
8^)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-25-2004
Flatpicker Flatpicker is offline
...
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,300
Rep Power: 41
Flatpicker has a reputation beyond reputeFlatpicker has a reputation beyond reputeFlatpicker has a reputation beyond reputeFlatpicker has a reputation beyond reputeFlatpicker has a reputation beyond reputeFlatpicker has a reputation beyond reputeFlatpicker has a reputation beyond reputeFlatpicker has a reputation beyond reputeFlatpicker has a reputation beyond reputeFlatpicker has a reputation beyond reputeFlatpicker has a reputation beyond repute
Paj,
Myself and others would like to know this as well and there's a very easy way to find out for sure: Call Marshall, ask to speak with Scott and he'll tell you anything you want to know. If you can't or don't want to call them, let me know and I'll call for you. Heck, I may just call them anyway because I've got a few other questions myself. If you call, let us know what he says.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-26-2004
Marik's Avatar
Marik Marik is offline
Pro Microphone Design
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salt Lake City
Age: 44
Posts: 931
Rep Power: 95182
Marik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond repute
Yeah, I just talked to Scott. He informed that 991 is a rebranded for GC 603. As Nat g. has suggested in our private conversation, another reason might be that this way they should not make a price match.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-26-2004
Paj Paj is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 534
Rep Power: 42618
Paj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond reputePaj has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks, Marik

Marik:

Game, set, match!

Thanks all,
Paj
8^)
__________________
8^)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-26-2004
Middleman's Avatar
Middleman Middleman is offline
Professional Amateur
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 2,874
Rep Power: 9529
Middleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond reputeMiddleman has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by Marik
Yeah, I just talked to Scott. He informed that 991 is a rebranded for GC 603. As Nat g. has suggested in our private conversation, another reason might be that this way they should not make a price match.
Did he explain the difference in weight? Looks like the same capsule but the mic is spec'd much heavier. Could be they made a mistake on the weight specification.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-26-2004
Marik's Avatar
Marik Marik is offline
Pro Microphone Design
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salt Lake City
Age: 44
Posts: 931
Rep Power: 95182
Marik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond reputeMarik has a reputation beyond repute
Sorry Middleman, I had no idea about different weight.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:23.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.