Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > Equipment Forums > The Rack


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Studio-effect Studio-effect News Studio-effect Medias Studio-effect Tests Studio-effect Articles Studio-effect User Reviews Studio-effect Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-15-2000
Hughes Hughes is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Hughes is on a distinguished road
Question

Trying to get an idea from posts on various BBS's about the quality of the sound on this unit. Some people feel it's great, that it's quiet and clean, while others think it's pretty mundane, even calling the resultant sound quality "brown".

Anybody here used this box and have an opinion? Seems like it covers a lot of bases; digital outs, tube warmth, etc., for not too much money. Has anybody heard how it sounds on the Mic Pre shootout CD?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-15-2000
dobro dobro is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,290
Rep Power: 131176
dobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond reputedobro has a reputation beyond repute
Lightbulb

1 Drstawl's got one, and he loves it.

2 The 3D Audio Pre CD is a revelation - cut after cut, WITH VERY LITTLE DIFFERENCE IN SOUND. I've listened to it on a commercial CD player, and through my soundcard with headphones, and at first the suspicion crossed my mind that the whole thing was a scam - they'd recorded just the one track and multiplied it 36 times, and then charged everyone for the CD! Of course, I knew that wasn't true, because there were pictures of the event with all the different pres stacked up and being tested, plus the shootout was covered in a major audio magazine, plus the guy who organized the event, Lynn Fuston, is not the kind of guy who'd run a scam like that. Also, the singer varies her delivery on a couple cuts, which also proves they actually did the test. The point I'm making is - that's how little difference there is in quality pres as far as I'm concerned - so little it's hard to tell the difference. I think there are differences, but that they are so small as to amount to conoisseur material only. They're for engineers to argue about. And if you believe that, then when you pick the pre you want, there's not much to lose, is there?

This might turn out to be interesting - I think I'm pointing out the fact that the emperor's not wearing any clothes, but others will probably say, nah, you just can't hear right.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-15-2000
virtual.ray virtual.ray is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 668
Rep Power: 10
virtual.ray is on a distinguished road
Wink

I bought one in April,used it for 3 weeks and returned it.I feel the converters are quite good,but I didn't think that it stood out judging it as a preamp.Several magazines have reviewed it lately and from what I've read the posts on this site are reflective of the magazine reviews:mixed.Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-16-2000
drstawl's Avatar
drstawl drstawl is online now
5K Californium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Newport Beach, CA USA
Posts: 5,699
Rep Power: 911690
drstawl has a reputation beyond reputedrstawl has a reputation beyond reputedrstawl has a reputation beyond reputedrstawl has a reputation beyond reputedrstawl has a reputation beyond reputedrstawl has a reputation beyond reputedrstawl has a reputation beyond reputedrstawl has a reputation beyond reputedrstawl has a reputation beyond reputedrstawl has a reputation beyond reputedrstawl has a reputation beyond repute
Unhappy

Dobro: I kind've thought that the 3D Audio Pre CD shootout would sound like what you described.

Hughes: I think that "mundane" is what I was looking for in a pre. Two channels. Clean. Plenty of gain and simultaneous digital and analog I/O. It's not as "do-all" as some other pres that add compressors or other effects.

virtual.ray: You omitted one important detail in your post. You say that the 386 didn't stand out as a pre. OK. Against what?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-16-2000
Track Rat's Avatar
Track Rat Track Rat is offline
Total Gear Slut
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ballwin, Mo. USA
Age: 52
Posts: 10,941
Rep Power: 137582
Track Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond reputeTrack Rat has a reputation beyond repute
Wink

I have one and I'm thinking about getting another one. I'd like to use it for a front end on a portable system to record two tracks direct to DAT.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-16-2000
virtual.ray virtual.ray is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 668
Rep Power: 10
virtual.ray is on a distinguished road
Wink

The other units I was experimenting with at the time were: Event EMP-1,Mackie 1402VLZ,ART DualMP,ART Tube PAC,Roland VM3100 Pro.The particular 386 I had here had some problems,a frying bacon noise would come and go randomly...didn't inspire confidence.Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-16-2000
Rev E Rev E is offline
Force of Nature
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Columbus, OH, USA
Posts: 955
Rep Power: 5148
Rev E has a reputation beyond reputeRev E has a reputation beyond reputeRev E has a reputation beyond reputeRev E has a reputation beyond reputeRev E has a reputation beyond reputeRev E has a reputation beyond reputeRev E has a reputation beyond reputeRev E has a reputation beyond reputeRev E has a reputation beyond reputeRev E has a reputation beyond reputeRev E has a reputation beyond repute
Thumbs up

I recently go the 3D Audio CD. When listening to the CD, I would recommend that you take a few breaks between listening to prevent everything from running together. To me the CD revealed that the difference between many preamps are very subtle. Unlike dobro, I found that there WEre some very noticeable differences between preamps. I'd suggest listening on good studio monitors in a good room. I immediately found preamps that I liked.

I must say that I picked the 386 blindly in both voice and guitar tests. It made my "good" list, which included about 5-7 of the pre's. I suppose everyone's going to have their own opinion. I think the take-home message is that you should make your own opinion. However, I will say that I haven't really heard anyone actually say that they didn't like the sound. Most of the complaints against the dbx 386 has been it's lack of built-in compressor and EQ. Personally, for two channels of tube preamplification and digital output AND a separate analog output, it's hard to beat. Many of the units that people compare it to are ONe-channel units with compressor and EQ... A total incorrect comparison.

Rev E
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 13:45.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.