![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Aardvark Q10 users?
I am a Sonar 2.2XL and dual Aardvark Q10 user. I am at a point where I am going to either upgrade to the new version of sonar or jump to Cubase.
I am interested in finding someone who has moved from Sonar to Cubase SX. Specifically I am interested in stability and usability between Cubase and Aardvark. Any notes, thoughts or general recommendations would be much appreciated. Jim |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have an Aardvark Q10 and use it in conjunction with Cubase. The combination has worked great for me so far. I like to keep my effects non-destructive for as long as possible so I can change them, which takes up a lot of memory, but I'm sure this is similar with other programs. I've found Cubase to be a bit more stable than Samplitude, which I used before. Latency is very low. The routing can get a little tricky sometimes if you're using the spdif, but other than that it's been good for me. Let me know if you have any other specific questions.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
please take a look at the post i amde in the soundcards section and see if you can help me out iwth my q10..thanks!
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Q10 and cubase is great combo
i was forced to give up my q10 because my pc is powered by a dual processor which q10 couldn't handle ( at least that was so when i had to switch to tascam fw1884) |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|