![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
In Praise of Moskus
For making me get two monitors.
I still cannot rely on that evil console view, but Sonar on two monitors is truly a wonderful beastie - real estate, and lots of it! Enough even to keep that Track Inspector visible all the time ![]() Now - I am still on Win2k - I have seen some posts about XP having greater dual monitor configuration stuff. What is it? Are the benefits enough to justify moving OS? Q.
__________________
<insert something witty here> |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() And yes, move up to Windows XP. Windows 98 was pretty good handling two monitors, Win2000 was... disappointing. WinXP does a good job. At least for my videocard, ATI Radeon 7500.
__________________
Two wrongs don't make a right, but two Wrights once made an airplane... |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I stuck a dual-head Radeon 9600 into
![]() Currently running one 19" at 1280 * 1024 and another 17" at 1152 * 8 hundred and whatever it is. With XP is there a default mechanism for assigning which application and window appears on which monitor? Cheers, Q.
__________________
<insert something witty here> |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The advantage (for me) is that ATI are making better drivers for XP than 2000.
__________________
Two wrongs don't make a right, but two Wrights once made an airplane... |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"...if the opposite of pro is a con lets go beyond this, the opposite of CONgress must be PROgress..." Cage |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Porter |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
i have a dual head nvidia card and thats how it works for me.
__________________
"...if the opposite of pro is a con lets go beyond this, the opposite of CONgress must be PROgress..." Cage |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|