Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Analog Only


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Recorder-multitrack Recorder-multitrack News Recorder-multitrack Medias Recorder-multitrack Tests Recorder-multitrack Articles Recorder-multitrack User Reviews Recorder-multitrack Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-31-2004
crimlawfed crimlawfed is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
crimlawfed is on a distinguished road
Recorded conversations

My name is Jon May. I am a criminal defense attorney in Fort Lauderdale and I am having a problem understanding conversations recorded at locations where there is a great deal of background noice, such as at restaurants. These recordings were made by a government informant. My guess is that a graphic equalizer would help me to remove some of the background noice and bring up some of the soft voices. Any suggestions.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-31-2004
The Ghost of FM's Avatar
The Ghost of FM The Ghost of FM is offline
French Mofo
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Jungles of Canukistan
Age: 48
Posts: 4,477
Rep Power: 3172588
The Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond repute
My suggestion would be transfer your recording to a digital format where you can see a graphical analysis of the subjects frequency range and remove all those areas of sound that are above and below the subject's area of sound.

An analog 1/3 octave eq might do the trick if you must keep the tape in it's original format for evidensary purposes and if so, a trained ear is worth hiring to filter out the sounds you don't need and amplifying the ones you do.

Consulting a legal peer would also be prudent in ascertaining the legality of altering a sound recording and still having it be admissible in a court of law.

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-01-2004
Blue Bear Sound's Avatar
Blue Bear Sound Blue Bear Sound is offline
Don't feed the bear......
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 12,897
Rep Power: 215
Blue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond reputeBlue Bear Sound has a reputation beyond repute
And for the future - try and use a very directional mic... Sennheiser has shotgun mics that will focus on a specific point and minimize sounds outside that point.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-01-2004
crimlawfed crimlawfed is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
crimlawfed is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your suggestions.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2004
Beck's Avatar
Beck Beck is offline
Analog Partisan Ranger
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Suddenly
Posts: 4,024
Rep Power: 493165
Beck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond reputeBeck has a reputation beyond repute
I'm assuming the recording was made on cassette or micro-cassette tape. Even if it is a small digital recorder some of this will apply.

I did some work about 6 years ago in a couple of cases for a police detective friend. One was to help identify a voice in a phone threats/stalking case. The caller was kind enough to leave the obscene threats on an answering machine. He used a pay phone so there was a lot of traffic in the background. He also altered his voice with a cheap voice-masking device (pitch transposer).

One source of noise to overcome is the hiss of the tape itself and other electronic noise produced by the recording device. I used a Hush IICX single ended noise reduction unit to get that noise level under control. I then used an Alesis MEQ 230 1/3 octave equalizer to bring his voice well above the background. Finally, I used the pitch transposer of a Yamaha SPX-90 to reverse the voice masking.

The female victim recognized the voice as that of a former coworker. I am told the suspect was very surprised to hear the threats he had made unmasked and clear as a bell in his normal voice.

I suggest you contact a local recording studio in Ft. Lauderdale for assistance. Or you can send me a copy on cassette, or CD, or send me a wav or mp3 and I will be able to tell you what can be recovered from the recording.

Tim

Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 17:51.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.