![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
?upgrade to sonar 3 producer or buy waves renassance max
i have sonar 2.2 and can't decide wether to buy renassance maxx (waves) or to to upgrade to 3.1 producer. is there a big difference is effects quakity and simplicity?
does 3 still have poor dithering down to 16 bit and how steep is the learning curve- are there any other effects bundles worth considering. I would like to try my hand at "mastering" and obviously I want it to be as straight forward as possible (simple) Moskus says waves IMHO is the best but i can't find what it stands for? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: ?upgrade to sonar 3 producer or buy waves renassance max
Quote:
![]() IMHO = In my humble opinion. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ?upgrade to sonar 3 producer or buy waves renassance max
[QUOTE] does 3 still have poor dithering down to 16 bit [QUOTE]
one of the new features in the 3.1 update is this: "High-quality sample rate conversion when importing and exporting audio—SONAR now utilizes the ultra high-quality Windowed Sinc resampler algorithm " Read the rest here: http://www.cakewalk.com/Products/SONAR/31update.asp
__________________
H-Musikk.no |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: ?upgrade to sonar 3 producer or buy waves renassance max
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Two wrongs don't make a right, but two Wrights once made an airplane... |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
will my 2.2 project be readable in 3.1
also how steep is the leap (learning curve) to 3.1
I was at a project 5 seminar recently and when instructor asked who had sonar 3 most of those people couldn't figure out how to use it ! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: ?upgrade to sonar 3 producer or buy waves renassance max
[QUOTE]Originally posted by HMusikk
[QUOTE] does 3 still have poor dithering down to 16 bit Quote:
Sonar has always been able to change bit depth. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I say go for 3. The supreme buss routing alone kicks 2's butt. 3 Is so flexible. I also like the new individual mini console ito the left of track view thingy. (not sure what it's acually called, but it rocks). I think if you've got a good handle on 2.2, 3PE will be a breeze for you.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: will my 2.2 project be readable in 3.1
Quote:
Seriously, if you have some experience using Sonar (version 1 or 2), then Sonar 3 is a very simple. Remember that you always have the big manual to help you out. And of course: we're here! ![]()
__________________
Two wrongs don't make a right, but two Wrights once made an airplane... |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, agree with those above. With budget on mind, get SONAR 3.1 !!! Waves can wait while combination of Ultrafunk 3 and Lexicon Pantheon will keep you bussy for months...
![]() Jaymz
__________________
Keep Rockin' and Rollin'...
|
|
#10
|
|
I agree with the masses....
Upgade to Sonar 3. You will hear a world of difference! spin |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|