Home Recording

Go Back   Home Recording > General Discussions > Analog Only


        

                                
                                10/30 - [video] Demo Roland TD-20SX
Reply    Audiofanzine Recorder-multitrack Recorder-multitrack News Recorder-multitrack Medias Recorder-multitrack Tests Recorder-multitrack Articles Recorder-multitrack User Reviews Recorder-multitrack Classifieds Ads
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-09-2004
cjacek's Avatar
cjacek cjacek is online now
Analogue Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 6,239
Rep Power: 150311
cjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond repute
Arrow Need some assistance with my TASCAM 244

Hi,

Ok, I'm working on compressing and eq'ing some of my older tracks which I recorded to my 2 track cassette deck years ago. I put them on cd and wish work on 'em via my 244 mixer. I have only a 1 channel compressor, which I inserted to the "send, receive" jacks at the back of the 244 (for "access 1"). Now, here's the deal ... I'm going rca outs from my cd player to the mic/line in of the 244 to take advantage of the compressor on channel one and eq. Problem is that some of the tracks were done in stereo and going in to just channel one of the 244 leaves one of the tracks (of my song) completely out. I then thought that I really don't care if my song is going to be stereo or mono, as a final copy, but how do I take the sum of the 2 tracks (from my cd) and take advantage of taking these to the 244 and comping and eq'ing them ? I only have one channel compressor, as I said, and am wondering how I should patch or route the signal and where etc ... ? I hope you understand this rather complex little issue of mine. If there's any other way of doing this please let me know.

Thanks for the help,

Daniel
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2004
The Ghost of FM's Avatar
The Ghost of FM The Ghost of FM is offline
French Mofo
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Jungles of Canukistan
Age: 48
Posts: 4,471
Rep Power: 3172588
The Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond repute
The proper way would be to get a second compressor of the same make and model so that the processing characteristics would be the same and maintain the original stereo recording.

Collapsing a stereo track down to mono through a splitter cable would mono the track and allow you to process this new mono mix with the singular compressor but, expect to run into serious phasing issues which may destroy what ever fidelity those tracks had unless there was perfect phase alignment, (azimuth), when it was transfered to CD in the first place.

Doing an overall compression on a finished track may also be of little benefit to you because these type of compression processes are best suited to specific applications like making your recording as loud as possible without clipping, which is a terrible effect that is over used in the industry by too many artists these days. The music just ends up yelling at you like a typist who uses ALL CAPS, ALL THE TIME! Do you really need this effect on your recordings?

Better still, let's ask you what are your goals in doing this compression process? What do you think ideally this compression exercise is going to do for you? Answer that and we can go from there.

As to the hook-up, get a patch cord Y adapter that has two male RCA plugs on one end and a singular female RCA jack on the other and then connect an RCA to 1/4" cable into your Portastudio's input and insert your compressor into the access send receive ports to affect the channel in use with the compressor.

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-10-2004
cjacek's Avatar
cjacek cjacek is online now
Analogue Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 6,239
Rep Power: 150311
cjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by The Ghost of FM
The proper way would be to get a second compressor of the same make and model so that the processing characteristics would be the same and maintain the original stereo recording.

Collapsing a stereo track down to mono through a splitter cable would mono the track and allow you to process this new mono mix with the singular compressor but, expect to run into serious phasing issues which may destroy what ever fidelity those tracks had unless there was perfect phase alignment, (azimuth), when it was transfered to CD in the first place.

Doing an overall compression on a finished track may also be of little benefit to you because these type of compression processes are best suited to specific applications like making your recording as loud as possible without clipping, which is a terrible effect that is over used in the industry by too many artists these days. The music just ends up yelling at you like a typist who uses ALL CAPS, ALL THE TIME! Do you really need this effect on your recordings?

Better still, let's ask you what are your goals in doing this compression process? What do you think ideally this compression exercise is going to do for you? Answer that and we can go from there.

As to the hook-up, get a patch cord Y adapter that has two male RCA plugs on one end and a singular female RCA jack on the other and then connect an RCA to 1/4" cable into your Portastudio's input and insert your compressor into the access send receive ports to affect the channel in use with the compressor.

Cheers!
Thanks Jeff!

I got meself a proper patch cord and will see what happens with the processing. I fully agree with you on flat as a ruler dynamics and normally I don't use this type of comping but .... the recordings I made quite a while ago had backing tracks which were compressed but my voice was not. It ends up being unbalanced with the backing music. I also was too close to the mic and ended up with overly boomy sound at quiter parts. So, I guess I have to reduce the bass frequencies a bit and comp the voice, which pops in and out (mostly out ) of the song at times. I'm pretty much fixin' the recordings, which were not all recorded well at the time, to give them a more steady sound and less boominess and bass on the voice. We'll see what happens. Thanks again Jeff!

Daniel
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-2004
The Ghost of FM's Avatar
The Ghost of FM The Ghost of FM is offline
French Mofo
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Jungles of Canukistan
Age: 48
Posts: 4,471
Rep Power: 3172588
The Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond reputeThe Ghost of FM has a reputation beyond repute
Ah! OK.

Based on what is wrong with the original recording, you might be able to calm some of the level anomalies by compressing this recording by using a milder setting ratio of somewhere between 2:1 to 5:1 and carefully setting the attack and release ratio knobs so that the louder levels are detected quick and released relatively almost a quick. Also be very mindful of input level threshold setting on the compressor as this will determine which levels remain unprocessed and which peaks above that level get the treatment.

This will drag down what ever backing instruments are on the recording as well when the vocal peaks are detected so, it won't be a magic cure all, unfortunately but, if used with some discretion, it should calm it down a little without it being too noticeable as a processed effect.

Good luck with the project!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-10-2004
cjacek's Avatar
cjacek cjacek is online now
Analogue Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 6,239
Rep Power: 150311
cjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond reputecjacek has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by The Ghost of FM
Ah! OK.

Based on what is wrong with the original recording, you might be able to calm some of the level anomalies by compressing this recording by using a milder setting ratio of somewhere between 2:1 to 5:1 and carefully setting the attack and release ratio knobs so that the louder levels are detected quick and released relatively almost a quick. Also be very mindful of input level threshold setting on the compressor as this will determine which levels remain unprocessed and which peaks above that level get the treatment.

This will drag down what ever backing instruments are on the recording as well when the vocal peaks are detected so, it won't be a magic cure all, unfortunately but, if used with some discretion, it should calm it down a little without it being too noticeable as a processed effect.

Good luck with the project!
Thanks again Jeff! Much appreciated, as always!

Daniel
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Google
 


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 16:29.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2008 Audiofanzine except where noted. All Rights Reserved.