![]() | ![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Anyone shelf eq'ing vocals?
I don't know if this works well, but I was thinking the other day that most people's speakers don't reveal the entire 20-20k sound spectrum. So, if my recording environment (a small convoluted foam booth) gives me a good sound except the airy sound that resides in the high end, can't I just roll it off?
I tried this and my question now is, at what frequency can I start shelving so the voice doesn't sound too boomy? And if it does get boomy, can I compensate that somewhere else in the eq spectrum? If you've already tried this, please let me know how it works out. I'd hate to re-invent the wheel. -L
__________________
...as i slap you with my pimp hand, and take a sip from my pimp cup, and let you know what's on a pimp mind. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
as I replied in the thread of recording techniques, I think vocals are the most difficult of all to EQ, they can easily sound unnatural. When you EQ vocals, my only tip is to do it while you leave the rest of th mix on, so you can hear immediately if it fits the mix or not.
And don't forget, if the frequency isn't in the recording, you can't boost it !!! it is no point shelving up when you haven't captured anything decent in the high areas.
__________________
www.protoolsforum.com The board for all Pro Tools (LE) users!! Finally back online. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I know there's a bunch of threads on this, but I searched and only three came up. Sorry if I missed yours.
What I'm trying to do is shelve down at a frequency that after which, the sound isn't really necessary to the vocal. I'm trying to go as dry as I can and then add a little reverb or whatever. My environment was boomy, but I remedied that. Now I just cant get rid of that airy sound to the vocals. any suggestions, or should I not shelve off at all?
__________________
...as i slap you with my pimp hand, and take a sip from my pimp cup, and let you know what's on a pimp mind. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
then work my way down and see which sounds more open...more often then not its 25K with a 3db boost..the lower i go the more sibilance i get...FYI i'm using a shure sm7 thru a rnp...i also you this technique on rap vocals haven't tried it on a singer yet...just got my speck eq like a month ago...and its fukkin amazing
__________________
"...if the opposite of pro is a con lets go beyond this, the opposite of CONgress must be PROgress..." Cage |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
teacher - which speck model are you using, sounds like a recommendation to me !
kylen |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Same with mic modelers. You can't shape a transient that isn't there. MP |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Wayne
__________________
Monitoring at CathouseSound AetherAudio 'Continuum A.D. and TimePiece 'Mini (formerly S.P. Technology |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://www.mercenary.com/speckmodelasc.html
__________________
"...if the opposite of pro is a con lets go beyond this, the opposite of CONgress must be PROgress..." Cage |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|