Recent content by modson

Hi, dont quite understand your problem, but I'll try and explain what to do! 1- Set up a MIDI, Aux in and An Audio track 2 - Set the output of the aux in to internal bus 1-2. Then set the iinput of the audio track to internal bus 1-2. 3 - Set the midi instrument on the inserts of the aux in...

Dont know if this'll help Try going into the playback engine (in options) and increasing the buffer size etc. cheeres chris

thanx for the replys guys thanx for the replys guys, go myself an amp today, gonna be playing through the Rogers to see what they're like! Thanks for all the advise, do I really have to endure 'commercial' music????? ;) Apparently the Rogers are BBC designed speakers as 'reference monitors'...

I tried a Blumlein pair with two AKG 414's the other day and that was ACE! very 'cultured' open sound, I was miking up an upright piano and it just sang! I also tried an ORTF with very similar results but nit quite as nice. chris :D

Hi all, Im trying to set myself a little project studio and want some decent monitors to help with mixing. I have a modest budget of £250 and basically am totally perplexed by the talk of crossover frequencies etc. my room is rather small (probably 8'/10') so I know that bass build up might be...

Sorry, i think i misunderstood! i thought you had the masters!

YES! If you're using a digital system then you could just automate it! i.e. drop the volume for the sweasring to zero and back up again immediately afterwards - Very easy to do on Pro tools not sure about other DAW's

Cheers Cheers for any and all help on the masters front. Will be looking into it! ..."Never Heard of Shure"... wow! 57 & 58 are very robust, fairly cheap (£70) dynamic (moving coil) mics. not a great high end response, worth having in your collection though (P.S the Beta 57/58 are much nicer...

I run a G4 mac mini with a 002 Rack. I would advise you to get a G5 if possible. I have had very little trouble with my mini / PT at low / mid sample rates, but @ 96Khz it gets a bit spluttery. Again if I have >15 tracks all with real time compression, EQ etc this too is spluttery. G4 is...

GET NEW FRIENDS PT is digital - no fidelity loss at all. editing is f#%king amazing in PT - use smart tool and move to the end of a region, you see the cursor change to a square, either with an x in which is the crossfade tool - OR a diagnal line for fade ins/outs mastering though is not...

you can use it on 1 track several or th whole mx if you choose providing that you can set it up to cover more than one channel in real time. in digital systems its muh different, there are EQ and compressors available for each track so you coud have an infinate amount of the two running given...

swearing!

Why not mix in Quad? :D - is there any place for irony here! if not i'll stop. im not sure it translates as text anyway P.S Pet sounds is in mono Because Wilson is deaf in his right ear and therefore cannot hear in stereo - but god I wish he could!

Jealousy Well first of all! I AM JEALOUS. I'd love an analogue set up! my limited experience is digital only unfortunately. but I can help on the comp EQ topic hopefully (until someone justly or not tells you im wrong). You can use either at any point in your project! Though anything you print...

yeh, you need to trust monitors! HP's generally have great frequency reponse (especially to bass) which unless you have top class nearfields you wont get! i have similar probems. I cant afford monitors at the mo and all my mix's are sounding good in the cans but not on the stereo. I'd avoid...