Is the singer single most important element of the song ?

[folker]

Hi all, while browsing other forums i came across this statement:

"The singer is the single most important element of a song. Gtr licks, bass notes or kybrd gymnastics are not."

(from www gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/803766-whats-your-opinion-about-changing-songs-key-fit-vocalist.html )
and reading further, people seem to agree completely. Which kinda bothers me, cause i never felt it such way.
Let me explain. I have allways been "alternative" musician, basically it means i never cared for pop music, or radio songs in general. Granted, if you take away vocals from any pop hit, there´s nothing left.
However, i had been allways fan of "weird" bands like Current 93, Comus, Legendary Pink Dots, Skinny Puppy, Tom Waits etc. None of these sound "radio friendly top notch" vocalist, but still Tom Waits is one hell of an influential artist, and in their genres, Skinny puppy and Current 93 were some of most influential bands too.
I am experimenting musician and my vocals kinda sucks. But i always hear music itself first, vocal is mere another instrument to me. Yet now i see "vocal is everything, screw the music" as generally accepted opinion. To be honest, almost every "top notch production" professional radio hit that has great vocals i ever heard, used very few simple phrases to express absolutely uninteresting lyrics about "i love you and allways will" blah blah something like this.
Thus, it seems what the lyric says doesn´t matter, or better, they don´t have to say something ineresting or important, rather the opposite - they dont have to pass any sense not to distract from actual "vocal performance".
Lyrics has to be crap but sung professionally :-) , kinda sad to me.
NOw, lately i moved to listening and writing folk music, which has been allways about "civil" vocals with focus on text itself.

So, whats your point of view on subject ?
Does these claims apply only to "pop" music ?
Or does "bland" vox ruins everything regardless of genre ? Regardless of what lyrics are about to say ?

[Steenamaroo]

Or does "bland" vox ruins everything regardless of genre ? Regardless of what lyrics are about to say ?

Immediately screams dylan to me! lol. OK, he wasn't bland, but certainly monotonous if you're not into him.


I don't have a lot to contribute here, but I'll be very keen to see this thread grow.

The two guys that I'm currently working with are wordy singer/songwriters.
Both of them want to be on the radio but both of them want to be Dylan, deep inside.

One has what you'd call a nice enough voice, the other I'd say is a 'take note' singer.
To be fair, the stronger, more intricate lyrics probably lie with the weaker voice, but I'd almost guarantee that radio plays and CD sales will go to the other guy.

Good question.

[guitarplayr82]

I've always been told that even if you don't like the voice or the lyrics or the melody, the vocal still needs to be front and center in the mix. The vocal is what [usually] hooks people in and makes them want to keep listening. It's the melody that people will get stuck in their head and want to hum to themselves after they hear a really catchy song. Nobody ever hums a guitar solo or a bass groove. It's always the lead vocal that sticks with people.

That's my opinion. Of course, this is a generalization and will vary with each genre, band, and song. But if you're aiming for something "radio-friendly" then the lead vocal is where it's at.

[Greg_L]

Singers only matter to old ladies, teenage girls, and people that aren't musicians. Dumb masses and musically clueless types can only relate to singing, so that's what they focus on. My mom, for example, doesn't appreciate or understand a cool drum pattern or interesting guitar playing. She only listens to words and melodies. That's how most music listeners operate. The reality is that singers are no more or less important than any other instrument of the band - even in pop music. They are just another instrument. The singer has to fit the music just like the guitarist does, or drummer, or whatever. Celine Dion wouldn't be right for hardcore punk just like Jello Biafra wouldn't be right for Disney soundtracks. So it really just depends on the audience. Yngwie Malmsteen's fanbase couldn't care less about singers. Buddy Rich's fans don't care about singers.

[grimtraveller]

people seem to agree completely. Which kinda bothers me, cause i never felt it such way.

When you say it like that, it sounds like you are trying to get validation for your tastes and choices.

Granted, if you take away vocals from any pop hit, there´s nothing left.

Virtually any song with vocals, if the vocals are taken away, you have a different song. Regardless of the genre or style.

I am experimenting musician and my vocals kinda sucks.

You make this sound like a "I can't sing so I'm going to take it out on vocalists and vocals" type rant. I'm not saying that's what you're doing, but you make it sound that way.

But i always hear music itself first, vocal is mere another instrument to me.

For me, it really depends. The voice is merely another instrument but it has a function that, frankly is unlike any other.

The vocal is what [usually] hooks people in and makes them want to keep listening.

The direction of a song with vocals is very often set by the vocals so it has an importance that is undeniable.
But really, the OP's question is reflective of the obsession of Western man with individuality and leaders and those "out front" rather than the reality of components, process and what it really takes to get something done. Songs are made up of a variety of components, each of which is crucial to the overall effect. One of the things that has been increasingly lost as instrumentalists have taken a back seat to machinery is the idea that every instrument has a part to play and that human beings contribute imoprtant parts to a song. It shows how much distinctiveness was taken for granted. "A drum beat" was not enough. A drummer supplying beats, patterns and fills was.
I could go on, but suffice it to say, just because other elements support the vocal does not mean that the vocal is more important. There isn't really a "more important". All the components have their part to play.

Yet now i see "vocal is everything, screw the music" as generally accepted opinion.

Well, not really. Many do feel the vocal is all important but it certainly doesn't follow that people in general aren't interested in the music. Music and vocals, however you look at it, go together. I think that we often oversimplify this whole topic.

To be honest, almost every "top notch production" professional radio hit that has great vocals i ever heard, used very few simple phrases to express absolutely uninteresting lyrics about "i love you and allways will" blah blah something like this.

You can't have heard many songs on the radio if that's what you think all the songs are about. As to whether lyrics are interesting or not, that's always personal taste.

They dont have to pass any sense not to distract from actual "vocal performance".
Lyrics has to be crap but sung professionally - kinda sad to me.

Well, sometimes, what the lyrics say isn't felt to be particularly important. Sometimes, the melody, the way it meshes with the music and the brilliance of the performance helps make the song and the lyrics become unimportant. Or the lyrics may be fantastic but pass over the listener's head because of the melody, the way it meshes with the music and the brilliance of the performance. The artist may feel the lyric is important but the listener may not and vice versa.

It's the melody that people will get stuck in their head and want to hum to themselves after they hear a really catchy song. Nobody ever hums a guitar solo or a bass groove. It's always the lead vocal that sticks with people.

That's partly true and partly not true.
There are more musicians in the world than we often realize and musicians hear music differently. But the advent of the air guitarist and the cult of the guitar hero and the way percussionists are revered in Asia, south America and Africa and the way kids will respond totally differently as soon as they hear drums {artificial or otherwise} indicates that actually, lots of people all over the world hear different parts of songs.
I hum solos and riffs all the time and my 11 year old son does likewise. We hum solos together then laugh heartilly.

Singers only matter to old ladies, teenage girls, and people that aren't musicians

One has to remember that long before there was recording, there were live singers and they had to be the focus. Human beings speak and the singer communicates the words. That would make them stand out.

doesn't appreciate or understand a cool drum pattern or interesting guitar playing....only listens to words and melodies.

Sometimes I will suddenly pick out an interesting guitar melody or bass part or drum pattern or tambourine or harmony vocal ~ and yet I could've been listening to that song for 20 years ! Sometimes a song appears to me as the overall sound. Then as I listen to it more, I zoom in on particular aspects. And sometimes it's the other way around.

The reality is that singers are no more or less important than any other instrument of the band - even in pop music. They are just another instrument. The singer has to fit the music just like the guitarist does, or drummer, or whatever.

So true. Which brings me back to my main point ~ every element has a part to play. No one element is more important. They all do different things. I've spent most of my life listening to music that has no singer as well as all the stuff with singers.
It's all Iraq and roll to me.......

[Greg_L]

Which brings me back to my main point ~ every element has a part to play. No one element is more important. They all do different things. I've spent most of my life listening to music that has no singer as well as all the stuff with singers.
It's all Iraq and roll to me.......

Yeah I've said it many times, for me personally, I'd be just fine with only listening to instrumental music. Hell, I spend a great deal of my listening time listening to The Ventures, Man or Astroman, Dick Dale, and other surf rock instrumental stuff. I do value the right singer for the right band, but like I said I treat the voice as just another instrument in the band, not the focus.

[Armistice]

You trying to stress test the multi-quote function there Grim?

I think the plethora of TV talent shows that almost exclusively feature singers and the various spin off activities that come with them are placing an emphasis on singers/singing at this particular point in time...

If you take away the vocal, and the music bores you, then it's not much of a tune. Sadly that's the case with a lot of what sells at the moment. I get bored with music that I can instantly deconstruct and know exactly what everyone's doing immediately because it's all so "standard" - but that's just me.

Ever heard Sigur Ros? They make up their own language, so you never have the faintest idea what they're singing about, therefore the voice is purely an instrument in that setting. Others do similar things. Does it work? Don't know... I'm not a huge fan but they seem to have a reasonable support base.

All genres of music can be really tedious if not approached with imagination and skill, irrespective of the quality of the singing/melody.

Do what you want to do and don't worry about what everyone else is doing.

[ido1957]

You sound like you're jealous of good singers.

[Greg_L]

You sound like you're jealous of good singers.

I'm jealous of all singers. They usually don't have any equipment to haul back and forth to gigs.

[folker]

When you say it like that, it sounds like you are trying to get validation for your tastes and choices.

No. I dont go to forums to rant. I was curious to see different opinions on subject. The quote i posted is clearly engineer's point of view, and homerecording residents are mostly musicians (though engineers too).
And for that "i always love you blah blah" part, that was simplification, man.
My grammar may fool you to think i am native english speaker but far from that, excuse my lack of communicating skills.
I know (from reading KLF's Manual :-) that pop lyrics deal with emotions, as that is simple most effective way to get anyone hooked.
I know anyone listens to different aspect of music, my drummer friend only values music with great drums no matter singer does :-)
Thanks for reply everyone, keep em coming ;-)