Pinky
and The Brain...
I've been to upstate NY. It's pretty to look at, but I was ready to commit suicide after about 4 hours.
We are likely never going to see eye to eye. I lived in Florida for a year, and I moved back here.
I've been to upstate NY. It's pretty to look at, but I was ready to commit suicide after about 4 hours.
Not everyone wants to be bothered with gear anymore. It's on the way out, like it or not.
I've been to upstate NY. It's pretty to look at, but I was ready to commit suicide after about 4 hours.
We are likely never going to see eye to eye. I lived in Florida for a year, and I moved back here.
Yeah, miro, you may not respect me. I respect myself just fine, thanks.
Indeed, it's a worthy topic as I know a lot of 'old school' guitarists like me are/were hesitant to make the jump to virtualization.
Amplitube not only offers a spectacular software package, but they have a nifty pedal (albeit expensive for what it is) that allows a robust set of controls and triggers. In addition, many professional musicians are turning to virtualization for live shows (or stomp boxes with direct ins with zero use of amps). Reduces the amount of crap they have to carry, that's for sure! lol
For VST consideration I submit:
IK Multimedia | AmpliTube 3
There are many software solutions out there that vary in price and features. There's also a lot of customization that can be done, not just in the software patches and presets, but with integration of midi for triggering and wah/volume effects. I would also argue that amplification simply doesn't need to be done at the instrument level anymore. Modelling and effects have come a long way in a short time. Aside from live show presentation, there really just isn't a lot of benefit to spending tons and tons of money on the classic guitar head/amp/speaker/pedal setup. If anything, it only adds complexity to the production side and limitations to what can be done (physical nobs only turn so far!). There will always be the button pushers and nob turning crowd, like people who can't shop for things online and need to touch merchandise, but for the remaining majority this is today's the most cost effective path to the best and biggest sound possible.
I get the impression that you are under the assumption that I'm some dumb dinosaur. You can think that if you want, but I'm not. I'm out there in the trenches actually gigging and going to shows. I'm in a city of 5 million+ people and a fucking shitload of bands. I can tell you definitively two things:
1) No one is gigging with sims. Not in the rock, punk, blues, metal, country, or indie genres anyway.
2) They don't sound better than a good amp.
There are a lot of options out there, and we always end up balancing tone, cost and portability. No one thing is right for everyone.
Which part of NYS...and why, what bothered you after 4 hours?
I only feel that way when I go to NYC...and I've lived in the NJ/NY area most of my life.
Now, he's playing places where he knows there are adequate systems to jack into. .
The original subject from the mixing thread was about whether someone should be mic'ing guitar amps i nthe studio. It seems to be the consensus here even that doing that is unnecessary, and that amplification is really only needed for live performances.
I do absolutely LOVE NYC though. Love it. Been there many times. I was this > < close to moving there a long while back.
We need Lt Bob to weigh in on this. No one on this site gigs or has gigged as much as that guy.
it's often still just stage amps for volume.
it's often still just stage amps for volume.
...WTF does anything here have to do with you....did I mention you...huh?????
I understand that you probably didn't follow my link, and it was like tl;dr anyway....no self-respecting guitar player is going to show up on stage with a guitar, cord and laptop.
.It works for that Marshall monstrosity above just as well.