Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Recording, mixdown to analog source ::

  1. #1
    Badtz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Downtown Los Angeles, CA.
    Posts
    136
    Rep Power
    13

    Question Recording, mixdown to analog source ::

    Sign in to disable this ad
    Was wondering if I had a song/mix done on my PC, if I wanted a more "analog" sound...... what's the best way to achieve this?

    via.....

    a tube amp/compressor of some sort?

    or

    into a tape-based source?

    *benefits from going either way?

    also, i would have to re-route all of this back into the PC to record onto CD right?

    any suggestion on equipment?

    thanks

  2. #2
    Blue Bear Sound's Avatar
    Blue Bear Sound is offline Don't feed the bear......
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, ON, Canada
    Age
    49
    Posts
    12,897
    Rep Power
    42711
    What exactly do you think you mean when you say "analog sound"?

    Bruce

  3. #3
    Oysterman's Avatar
    Oysterman is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Age
    32
    Posts
    165
    Rep Power
    14
    Hiss and distortion?

  4. #4
    Badtz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Downtown Los Angeles, CA.
    Posts
    136
    Rep Power
    13
    warmth?

  5. #5
    Blue Bear Sound's Avatar
    Blue Bear Sound is offline Don't feed the bear......
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, ON, Canada
    Age
    49
    Posts
    12,897
    Rep Power
    42711
    If you wanted "warm" you should have recorded it that way!

    What is "warmth"??? Rolled-off highs???

    The implication in your post is that somehow "digital" fucked with your sound and it now lacks warmth.... well it's not "digital" that did it to you, it was the way you tracked it! The warmth is supposed to come from your sound source, not the recorder!


    Bruce

  6. #6
    Roel's Avatar
    Roel is offline That SMART guy.
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    back in be... euhm... France!!!
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,651
    Rep Power
    214763
    This idea comes from 2 points.

    First the old low end digital systems, which sucked. And they made stuff sound harsh. But that's history now...

    Then, second there's the coloration of the analog equipement taperecorders and tubegear. This can be nice, but it's not necessary. You can have perfectly good recordings without them, if you get it right from the start, as bruce said.

  7. #7
    Badtz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Downtown Los Angeles, CA.
    Posts
    136
    Rep Power
    13
    but if i do want hte analog coloration after-the-fact, what gear is advisable to achieve this?

  8. #8
    Blue Bear Sound's Avatar
    Blue Bear Sound is offline Don't feed the bear......
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, ON, Canada
    Age
    49
    Posts
    12,897
    Rep Power
    42711
    Actually... try this.... do a stereo submix to 2 new tracks....... push both tracks ahead by 10mS or so, then run the 2 submix'd tracks out to a 3-head cassette deck... take the output of the cassette deck (monitoring off the PLAY head - which will play back the freshly recorded tape - hence the need to push the submix ahead a few mS) and run it back into your PC and record it onto 2 NEW tracks...

    This way, everything is in-sync and you have a submix copy of the analog sound for comparison purposes to the non-analog submix.

    You can then mix some of the "analog" signal back into your mix as needed....

    I bet, however, that it won't do much for you........... ie, you won't get the "warmth" you expect from it....


    Bruce

  9. #9
    chalin27 is offline Force of Nature
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Posts
    507
    Rep Power
    49
    I would like to add my 2 cents. If your not recording at a high bit rate/frequency clock rate or playing back at the same rate your digital signal will not replicate what you initially recorded. Say if your recording/playback is at 44.1/16 bit. Will the recording/playback be as accurate as the sound you recorded? I think this is the frigid sound people speak of. Now that we can do those things at higher rates digital recording is better. Although digital has come along way. I still think the recording industry prefers recording to analog tape. I know that what I said doesn't help. I just thought I would add to the discussion.

  10. #10
    Badtz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Downtown Los Angeles, CA.
    Posts
    136
    Rep Power
    13
    thanks chaplin!

    i guess it's because i keep hearing about producers re-routing their mix into an analog-based storage medium to get that "warmth" of analog, then digitizing it again to burn.........

    i have no idea what equipment they use to achieve this........ or even ideas

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
A3E sponsorship event box

Check out A3E in Boston!