czar of bizarre
New member
a question for the "PROFESSIONAL'S" "GEEKS" or "GURUS" on this site.
i have a question for all the "pros" on this site. i need insight and clarification. i took the advice of several people on this forum and mixed down to a reel. so you guys can now say "I TOLD YOU SO"....
however i have several questions.
1.why is it that the digital recording LACKED low end but when it was put to tape the low end was noticible? the same with the hi's
2.15 ips took less tape and had BETTER low end than 30 ips. why is that?
3.does tape add frequencies to the music? why does the music sound more FULL and FAT and in your FACE than the digital recording?
4.is it possible to loose frequencies? i know its possible to loose bits but is it possible to loose frequencies?
5. i know my reasons for going digital analog back digital. why do OTHERS do it?
thanks
czar
ps. you guys arent REALLY pros........are you?
i have a question for all the "pros" on this site. i need insight and clarification. i took the advice of several people on this forum and mixed down to a reel. so you guys can now say "I TOLD YOU SO"....
however i have several questions.
1.why is it that the digital recording LACKED low end but when it was put to tape the low end was noticible? the same with the hi's
2.15 ips took less tape and had BETTER low end than 30 ips. why is that?
3.does tape add frequencies to the music? why does the music sound more FULL and FAT and in your FACE than the digital recording?
4.is it possible to loose frequencies? i know its possible to loose bits but is it possible to loose frequencies?
5. i know my reasons for going digital analog back digital. why do OTHERS do it?
thanks
czar
ps. you guys arent REALLY pros........are you?