+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Compression (AGAIN!) Before EQ or After EQ???

  1. #31
    jaynm26 is offline Force of Nature
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    867
    Rep Power
    1841033
    Sign in to disable this ad
    Quote Originally Posted by mixsit View Post
    That would depend- 'Eq trim the low end first so it's in closer shape to want you want in the first place, then dial in your dynamic?
    Or, eq 2nd- And maybe the cpmp reacts to that low tone balance and/or pulls' the low notes down -A similar effect to 'eq'.
    But.. what if it's reacting too much to those lows, not recovering fast enough and the next higher note (and/or your 'bite) is suffering for it?

    A lot of it is just jump in and see. But the whole exercise is just kinda being aware of what cause and effects might be in play, and use it as you can.
    Exactly you dont want end up chasing your tail. By cutting bass and boosting highs just to get the squashed by the comp. In this particular instance I can see "Massive's Approach" or rule of thumb might come into play of where EQ>Comp>EQ. Guess it all depends on source martial.

  2. #32
    bouldersoundguy is offline Three Thousand and Counting
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    3,186
    Rep Power
    7167592
    Quote Originally Posted by jaynm26 View Post
    Exactly you dont want end up chasing your tail. By cutting bass and boosting highs just to get the squashed by the comp.
    Except that it's not just the highs that get squashed, it's all frequencies at once.

  3. #33
    PaddyGordon is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    174
    Rep Power
    216827

    Lightbulb

    I thought this would appear to be common sense:

    If it sounds better to me on a specific track at that time before, then before.

    If it sounds better to me on a specific track at that time after, then after.

    If I need to edit before and after to make it sound good, then before and after.

    And if it sounds better without eq, then I don't use eq.

  4. #34
    bouldersoundguy is offline Three Thousand and Counting
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    3,186
    Rep Power
    7167592
    Quote Originally Posted by PaddyGordon View Post
    I thought this would appear to be common sense:

    If it sounds better to me on a specific track at that time before, then before.

    If it sounds better to me on a specific track at that time after, then after.

    If I need to edit before and after to make it sound good, then before and after.

    And if it sounds better without eq, then I don't use eq.
    Of course, but after inserting stuff on tracks unknown thousands of times I don't feel the need to try every option every time. Anything with too much LF and a significant cut there sounds weird to me with the eq after the compressor. It doesn't make as much of a difference to most other material unless eq settings get fairly drastic. So if I use both the eq goes first because it never sounds weird to me.

  5. #35
    mixsit is offline Been Here, Posted That
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    CatHouseSound
    Age
    63
    Posts
    6,563
    Rep Power
    5832029
    Quote Originally Posted by PaddyGordon View Post
    I thought this would appear to be common sense:

    If it sounds better to me on a specific track at that time before, then before.

    If it sounds better to me on a specific track at that time after, then after.

    If I need to edit before and after to make it sound good, then before and after.

    And if it sounds better without eq, then I don't use eq.
    Sorry too late We already got it covered (..why it might work nicer one way or the other
    Monitoring at CathouseSound AetherAudio 'Continuum A.D. and TimePiece 'Mini
    (formerly S.P. Technology

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Normal compression VS Parallel compression
    By livepast00 in forum Mixing Techniques
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-14-2010, 12:42
  2. Pre compression and compression settings
    By y-kause in forum Mixing Techniques
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 09-04-2010, 09:49
  3. Bus compression versus track compression
    By Yareek in forum Mixing Techniques
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-08-2006, 16:57
  4. outboard compression vs. dsp card compression
    By Jaguar in forum The Rack
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-20-2004, 10:19
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-02-2001, 14:58

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
GearFest Mixing Contest

Biggest Ever Audio Mixing Contest is ON!