View Poll Results: Which monitor under 1000?

Voters
1. You may not vote on this poll
  • Adam A8x

    1 100.00%
  • Mackie HR824mkII

    0 0%
  • KRK VXT8

    0 0%
  • Focal Solo 6be

    0 0%
  • other - please specify!

    0 0%
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Adam A8x vs Mackie HR824mkII vs KRK VXT8 vs Focal Solo 6be?

  1. #1
    dickiefunk's Avatar
    dickiefunk is offline Force of Nature
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cornwall, UK
    Age
    39
    Posts
    774
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    584897

    Adam A8x vs Mackie HR824mkII vs KRK VXT8 vs Focal Solo 6be?

    Sign in to disable this ad
    Hi,

    I'm looking for some new monitors for a different studio setup .
    The monitors I have in my other studio setup are a pair of Acoustic Energy AE22's + Sub. These are great but in the new setup a sub won't really work in the room and there are times when I need to monitor really deep bass frequencies which the AE22's can struggle with. Also my budget can't stretch to the AE22's + sub which cost's around 1600.
    I would like a pair of monitors that can cope with deep low bass without port chuffing under 1000!
    These are the monitors on my shortlist :-

    Adam A8X
    Focal Solo6be
    KRK VXT8
    Mackie HR824 mkII

    I realise the Focal's aren't under 1000 but they do come up in b-stock fairly regularly!
    I will need them for a large variety of music and some of that will have deep bass. One feature I definately don't want is port chuffing!!

    I've had quite a bit of experince with the Focal CMS65's and Mackie HR824mkI's and heard the KRK VXT8's.

    I really loved the Focal CMS65's apart from the QC issues. I had 3 faulty pairs with 2 having lots of port chuffing and another with odd rattles inside! This put me off Focal but I haven't heard any issues with the Focal Solo 6be's?

    The mkI version of the Mackies sounded great but I found the mixes didn't translate as well as the Focal CMS65's or Acoustic Energy AE22's.
    How does the mkII version compare? Is it more accurate for mixing?

    I've only heard the KRK VXT8's in a shop with a semi treated room and these sounded great! I preferred these to Dynaudio BM6a's and ADAM A7's.
    I have no idea how accurate they translate mixes!??

    I've read pages of issues with the Adam A8X's concerning port chuffing etc. Apparently Adam are going to ( or have already ) sort this problem with flanges!? Can anyone confirm that this issue has been resolved?

    Which of these monitors would you recommend for accurate mixing that can cope with really deep bass without port chuffing? Is there anything else under 1000 that you would recommend?

  2. #2
    cobaltaudio's Avatar
    cobaltaudio is offline Force of Nature
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    560
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    1881406
    what exactly do you mean by "a large variety of music"? thrash metal all the way through pop and hip-hop to classical?

    The trouble with speakers of the size you're looking at, is that they inherently don't have a very extensive low end. You essentially need a bigger cabinet and meatier drive unit.
    Having said that, I've got a pair of ADAM A7's and am very happy with them, they're really easy to mix on. To me, it's better to have bass light monitors than bass heavy ones, as from my experience you end up with better low-end definition.
    Once you've got accustomed to how your speakers sound, I'd say bass light is easier to work with.

    I think going to listen to the speakers is a really good idea. Bookshelf sized speakers are hugely varied in quality and until you have actually heard the kind of material you want to play through them, it's very difficult to make an informed and objective decision.
    I actually didn't like the KRK's at all when I heard them, they struck me as really not working for classical mixing. I felt the dynaudio's actually were pretty decent but weren't outstanding for pop, and that the Adam's were the best of the bunch, and really very good value as the top end really does sound excellent. In my own personal opinion, there's not really much that beats them as all rounders, short of PMC's which will be way out of budget.

    You might want to look at Genelec, they do some fairly decent speakers in that price range. I'd have chosen them second, after the Adam's and might well be just what you're looking for. I think I heard the 8040A's, but they all look the same and am having trouble pinning down the exact ones I heard.

    I wouldn't read too many product reviews, listen to useful source material through as many pairs as are in your price range, and trust your ears.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Focal CMS 65 vs Adam A7X?
    By awolf97 in forum Other Equipment and Reviews
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-27-2011, 12:54
  2. KRK VXT4 + 10s vs Adam A7X vs Dynaudio BM5A MKII vs Focal CMS50/65
    By nazanone in forum Other Equipment and Reviews
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-22-2010, 11:35
  3. Adam A8x or Acoustic Energy AE22's?
    By dickiefunk in forum Mixing Techniques
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-16-2010, 04:18
  4. Adam A8X Review
    By Chater-La in forum Other Equipment and Reviews
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-14-2010, 08:40
  5. Adam, Genelec, Mackie, KRK
    By norm14 in forum Other Equipment and Reviews
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-18-2004, 09:27

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Special 93% Offer

Got beats? Samples? Mixing and mastering services? Get a head start with this 93% OFF special offer!