+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Passive Monitoring vs Active (Mastering)

  1. #1
    jaynm26 is offline Force of Nature
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    867
    Rep Power
    1841033

    Passive Monitoring vs Active (Mastering)

    Sign in to disable this ad
    As we go forward in the world of Audio Engineering more active monitoring is prevalent. We also see a little more active monitoring for mastering slowly popping up. Most have B&W/Dynaudio/Tyler and an Amp Brystons/Clasee/Krell with the best cabling money has to buy. Active monitoring is non of the sort simple monitor with built in amp and cabling. Some say the sound quality can be better than passive because all the routing of sound, wiring/cabling is out of the equation which leads to better playback. ME what is your take on Passive vs Active monitoring in mastering?

  2. #2
    Ethan Winer's Avatar
    Ethan Winer is offline Acoustics Expert
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    New Milford, Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,866
    Rep Power
    2852409

    Lightbulb

    Quote Originally Posted by jaynm26 View Post
    Some say the sound quality can be better than passive because all the routing of sound, wiring/cabling is out of the equation which leads to better playback.
    Yes, active monitors have a big advantage over passives, though not because the wiring is inside the speaker box. The quote below is from my book The Audio Expert.

    --Ethan

    Quote Originally Posted by The Audio Expert
    Active versus Passive Speakers

    A relatively recent design concept for loudspeakers is to include an active crossover plus power amplifiers built into the speaker enclosure. Mackie was one of the first modern companies to offer this in its HR824 and HR624 models, though studio monitors with active crossovers were produced as long ago as 1967 by Klein+Hummel. Today all-in-one active loudspeakers are very common. There are many advantages of active monitors for the typical project studio, besides a simpler hookup with fewer pieces to carry if you ever do remote recordings: Active speakers are typically bi-amped, which yields less distortion as already explained. Bi-amping also offers more ways to optimize the crossover performance because it uses active rather than passive components, as was also explained. Further, using an active crossover increases headroom within each band by segregating the bands. That is, if the amplifier that powers the bass range clips at a very loud volume, high frequencies are still reproduced cleanly unless that amplifier is also driven into distortion.

    Further, the power amplifiers can be well matched to the speakers, they won’t have a fan, and the wires between each power amp and its speaker are shorter, which might improve damping. (Amplifier damping is explained in Chapter 21.) An active loudspeaker can also contain DSP circuitry to counter frequency response errors in the drivers themselves and to add any needed delays so frequencies near the crossover point emit from both drivers at the same time. This not only improves frequency response, but it can also reduce the radiating directivity problem known as lobing, which will be described shortly. But to me, the overwhelming advantage of powered monitors, as implemented in Mackie speakers anyway, is that the woofer cone’s mechanical motion is included within the power amplifier’s electrical feedback loop. This improves low-frequency response, reduces ringing at the port’s resonant cutoff frequency, counters thermal compression in the voice coil, and reduces driver distortion.

    Negative feedback will be explained more fully in Chapter 21. But briefly for now, negative feedback lets an amplifier circuit self-correct its own output signal to reduce distortion and frequency response errors. A portion of the output is fed back to the input, but with the polarity reversed. So if the amplifier’s output is not an exact voltage-multiple of its input at a given point in time, its input receives more or less of the feedback signal. The amplifier in turn sends more or less signal to its output to compensate, which forces the output to better match the input. With an active speaker, the amplifier can be designed to sense the amount of current being drawn by the driver and compare that to the amount of current that should be drawn for a given input signal. If the two do not match, which means the driver is distorting or ringing, the amplifier varies its output signal to compensate.

  3. #3
    jaynm26 is offline Force of Nature
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    867
    Rep Power
    1841033
    Cool snip of info Ethan, appreciate it

  4. #4
    karumba's Avatar
    karumba is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    154
    Rep Power
    660068
    you can go a bit further with active speakers, since each speaker chassis has its own amp. you can also control the movement of the chassis a bit better. here is an example:
    AOI | PSIAudio

  5. #5
    Massive Master's Avatar
    Massive Master is offline MASSIVE Mastering, LLC
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Chicago area, probably looking for more coffee.
    Age
    45
    Posts
    7,653
    Rep Power
    12692720
    I'm a fan of passives -- I like matching the amps with the speakers (and in case of failure - amps fail - I like to be able to swap it out for another amp quickly and get back to work).
    John Scrip - MASSIVE Mastering


    Spoon-feed a newbie the answer and he'll mix for a day --
    Spark his curiosity to find the answer himself and he'll mix for a lifetime...

  6. #6
    GONZO-X's Avatar
    GONZO-X is offline Why 2K?
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Powderville
    Posts
    2,126
    Rep Power
    5652985
    ^+1

    passive, with power amp.
    More flexibility.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Active vs. Passive
    By pandamonk in forum Other Equipment and Reviews
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 08-07-2007, 12:46
  2. Active/Passive?
    By Amped in forum Guitars and Basses
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-28-2006, 09:48
  3. active vs. passive
    By shortness in forum Mixing Techniques
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-16-2005, 21:32
  4. Active -vs- Passive
    By aaron.p in forum Mixing Techniques
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-13-2003, 09:58
  5. Do I need passive or active?
    By microchip in forum Mixing Techniques
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-07-2001, 18:57

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
GearFest Mixing Contest

Biggest Ever Audio Mixing Contest is ON!