Vishnu kind of looks like Hendricks, so it works, right?
I like the art. It's simple, and works.
Though the Vishnu one kind of seems to have a lot of jpeg-type distortion going on (see the gradients between the blues). Is that a) from the original art b) intentional or c) jpeg distortion?
Though the Vishnu one kind of seems to have a lot of jpeg-type distortion going on (see the gradients between the blues). Is that a) from the original art b) intentional or c) jpeg distortion?
IaNaLB, I'm pretty sure most of Da Vincis work is in the public domain.
Although they're working on a law which tosses foreign material back under copyright, aren't they? If they're taking Peter and the Wolf out of public domain, why can't they take the Mona Lisa too?