famous beagle
Well-known member
I was curious how y'all handle this.
Any time I sell something on eBay and the buyer pays instantly (or very quickly), I always leave positive feedback right away (before I even ship the item). I think it helps set a positive tone to the transaction and think it would encourage them to contact me for help in resolving something in the case of some issue arising. I know that there's always the chance that you could run across some asshole who decides to be a real dick and then leaves negative feedback once you don't give in to their scam or otherwise ridiculous demands, but so far this approach has served me well, and I have 100% positive feedback with a score of 397.
My question is this: What do y'all do when you buy something, the seller has not given you feedback yet and then doesn't treat you well?
Short story: I bought an Alesis RA 100 power amp (for my new Yorkville monitors), and all the description said was "excellent condition." There were two pictures showing the amp and manual from front and back. The seller had 104 with 100% positive feedback, and the price ($40 + $42 shipping) was right, so I pulled the trigger.
Shipping was timely, I opened the box, pulled the unit out, and one of the knobs had fallen off. I looked closer, and the shaft was broken. It had obviously been repaired at one point because there was dried glue in there. The shaft was shattered in several pieces, so it was beyond repair. I searched on line and couldn't find any replacement knobs for the amp. Also the power cord was missing. That's not a huge deal, because I have those, but he didn't mention anything about that in the auction. He didn't say "what you see is what you get" either, so I don't know what the ruling on that would be. Ebay describes a "used item" as one that's fully functional, and it can't function without the power cord, so I think he should have mentioned that.
Then I noticed that there was a decently sized (about 1 " equilateral) triangular chunk missing from the plastic face plate. This plate was black, as is the metal chassis, so it was easy to miss. I checked the picture in the auction, and when I looked for it, I could see it, but it certainly wasn't obvious at all. You certainly wouldn't notice it unless looking for it --- and you wouldn't really look for it if the seller described it as "excellent condition." (Or at least that's the way it was for me.)
Anyway, so I contacted him and asked if he wouldn't mind refunding me $10 for the cost of a new knob set, which actually won't probably cover it (since they aren't available anymore), and I mentioned to him the other things (chunk missing and power cord missing). He wrote back and said "Sorry you don't like the item. If you ship it back we can split the shipping and I'll refund your money." I wrote him back and said that I'd still like to keep the item and it would be cheaper for him to simply refund me $10 than to split shipping charges for me to send it back. He wrote back and said, "You want $10 for a knob, are you serious? That's 25% of the cost of the amp." "Well yeah ... the cost of the 24-year-old used amp," I said. I said that I'd even be happy if he offered $5.
The short of it is that he said if I wanted a new knob, I'd have to file a damage claim with the post office. I don't understand his logic at all. He'd rather pay $21 (half the shipping) to get the amp back and refund all my money ($40) than simply refund me $5 and be done with it. But whatever. I told him thanks anyway. I'm not going to piss away $21 to ship it back to him.
So here we are with neither one having left feedback. I don't want to give him positive feedback, because I don't really think he deserves it. To be honest, I'd give him neutral feedback because he could have been a lot worse. But what do y'all do when there's a feedback standoff like this? Do you just not leave feedback at all? Do you do what's right regardless? I don't want to tarnish my perfect record over this, so I probably just won't leave feedback at all (unless he leaves me negative or something).
What do y'all do?
Any time I sell something on eBay and the buyer pays instantly (or very quickly), I always leave positive feedback right away (before I even ship the item). I think it helps set a positive tone to the transaction and think it would encourage them to contact me for help in resolving something in the case of some issue arising. I know that there's always the chance that you could run across some asshole who decides to be a real dick and then leaves negative feedback once you don't give in to their scam or otherwise ridiculous demands, but so far this approach has served me well, and I have 100% positive feedback with a score of 397.
My question is this: What do y'all do when you buy something, the seller has not given you feedback yet and then doesn't treat you well?
Short story: I bought an Alesis RA 100 power amp (for my new Yorkville monitors), and all the description said was "excellent condition." There were two pictures showing the amp and manual from front and back. The seller had 104 with 100% positive feedback, and the price ($40 + $42 shipping) was right, so I pulled the trigger.
Shipping was timely, I opened the box, pulled the unit out, and one of the knobs had fallen off. I looked closer, and the shaft was broken. It had obviously been repaired at one point because there was dried glue in there. The shaft was shattered in several pieces, so it was beyond repair. I searched on line and couldn't find any replacement knobs for the amp. Also the power cord was missing. That's not a huge deal, because I have those, but he didn't mention anything about that in the auction. He didn't say "what you see is what you get" either, so I don't know what the ruling on that would be. Ebay describes a "used item" as one that's fully functional, and it can't function without the power cord, so I think he should have mentioned that.
Then I noticed that there was a decently sized (about 1 " equilateral) triangular chunk missing from the plastic face plate. This plate was black, as is the metal chassis, so it was easy to miss. I checked the picture in the auction, and when I looked for it, I could see it, but it certainly wasn't obvious at all. You certainly wouldn't notice it unless looking for it --- and you wouldn't really look for it if the seller described it as "excellent condition." (Or at least that's the way it was for me.)
Anyway, so I contacted him and asked if he wouldn't mind refunding me $10 for the cost of a new knob set, which actually won't probably cover it (since they aren't available anymore), and I mentioned to him the other things (chunk missing and power cord missing). He wrote back and said "Sorry you don't like the item. If you ship it back we can split the shipping and I'll refund your money." I wrote him back and said that I'd still like to keep the item and it would be cheaper for him to simply refund me $10 than to split shipping charges for me to send it back. He wrote back and said, "You want $10 for a knob, are you serious? That's 25% of the cost of the amp." "Well yeah ... the cost of the 24-year-old used amp," I said. I said that I'd even be happy if he offered $5.
The short of it is that he said if I wanted a new knob, I'd have to file a damage claim with the post office. I don't understand his logic at all. He'd rather pay $21 (half the shipping) to get the amp back and refund all my money ($40) than simply refund me $5 and be done with it. But whatever. I told him thanks anyway. I'm not going to piss away $21 to ship it back to him.
So here we are with neither one having left feedback. I don't want to give him positive feedback, because I don't really think he deserves it. To be honest, I'd give him neutral feedback because he could have been a lot worse. But what do y'all do when there's a feedback standoff like this? Do you just not leave feedback at all? Do you do what's right regardless? I don't want to tarnish my perfect record over this, so I probably just won't leave feedback at all (unless he leaves me negative or something).
What do y'all do?