See, that makes sense.
In the days when 2" 24-tracks were the standard, I wonder how many studios had more than 24-track capabilities... I would imagine a 48-track desk plus a second 24-track machine would cost a lot more damn money, hehe.
At the same time, how many bands at the time went beyond 24 tracks, when they were recording vocals in one or maybe a few takes, instruments each had a channel or so, etc. etc.
As usual, technology has made us sloppier and less talented. 60 years ago and back, you had to nail the entire performance with the entire band in a take. Then came small multi-channel recorders and track bouncing, so you had a rhythm section recorded, then maybe vocals and lead parts added separately.
Then you got into 8+ channel studios, right up to 24. Bands could record individual parts over and over.
Nowadays you can sing a vocal part 487 times, and the engineer can cut out each individual word depending which was the "best".
I love multitrack technology, but yea... aaaand end unrelated rant!