Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: CAD M37 ...made in USA?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    866
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    15

    CAD M37 ...made in USA?

    Sign in to disable this ad
    I'm a big fan of CAD mics, and I liked the M37...but I was always under the impression that it, along with the rest of the "Global Audio" series of mics, was made in China. I noticed on their website now at http://www.cadmics.com/global_audio_m37.htm that the picture is now captioned: Made In USA!

    I wonder what that means...is it really made in the USA, or something less...

    Also kind of funny that this is the only mic on the website marked as such...

    Anyone talk to the dudes at NAMM and heard anything about changes in manufacturing or assembly?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Please forgive me. I don't mean to be a prick, but I guess I am.
    Age
    7
    Posts
    2,918
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    2104225
    I have an M37. The packaging says Made in USA, though the spec sheet doesn't. The spec sheet shows CAD as the apparent manufacturer, a division of CTI Audio in Conneaut, Ohio.

    The mic came with its own frequency response printout by serial number, and signed in ballpoint pen with feminine appearing initials.

    I suspect it is made, or at least assembled, in the usa - I could dissemble it to look at the PC board but that would entail removal of 4 black anodized phillips screws, and any ding marks on them would probably void the 2 year warranty.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    1,298
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    49
    I ask CAD about this at NAMM. They claim to make their diaphragms (and capsules, I think?) and assemble their mics here in the US. However, they told me they couldn’t put “Made In USA” on their products because there was some law that a certain percentage of the parts had to be made in the USA. Since a certain number of their parts come from overseas, they are not allowed to state this, even though they are asssembled here. Now whether or not they were blowing smoke, I don’t know, but that’s what they said. Sounds kind of fishy to me.

    I'm 99.9% sure the "Global Audio" series of mics are made in China.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    1,298
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    49
    BTW, at NAMM, none of the Global Audio mics were set up, but most of the 'domestic' ones were. For the record, I thought the M-177 sounded great and was much better than its more expensive, 3-pattern sibling, the M-179.

    They've got new versions of the E-100 and E-200 coming out which also sound pretty good.

    Funny, these are good sounding mics, but you don't see them discussed much around here...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,977
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    2618104
    I've heard good things about the sound of the M177 & M179,
    and have been considering one, except I have reservations about this:

    http://www.homerecording.com/bbs/sho...threadid=95856
    Tom

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Please forgive me. I don't mean to be a prick, but I guess I am.
    Age
    7
    Posts
    2,918
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    2104225
    The M37 also pulls 8ma current. Since it is rated for phantom voltage of 24 to 52 volts, you could probably use two of them in most dual channel preamps even if they pull the voltage down to 24 volts or above. However, you possibly couldn't use other mics needing the full 48v with it. Apparently the M37 and the M177 have identical electronics.

    According to tech support at CAD
    the circuit boards and electronics of the M37 and the M177 are the same. Besides the physical appearance, the capsules are different. Quality control is the same. We purchase the capsules from a vender and the actual thickness of the polymer is not speced for my use. It (M37 capsule) is the same version that was used in the E300 with just the front side.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,977
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    2618104
    Hey Crazydoc,

    The other mic I would be using it with would be an SM81, which Shure says will operate at 12-48V. So it should work. Have you tried anything like this? I kind of wonder about any drop in performance. Also, how do you like the M37? I hear a lot about the Cads being good, often overlooked mics.
    Tom

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Age
    47
    Posts
    11,823
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Originally posted by omtayslick
    The other mic I would be using it with would be an SM81, which Shure says will operate at 12-48V. So it should work. Have you tried anything like this? I kind of wonder about any drop in performance. Also, how do you like the M37? I hear a lot about the Cads being good, often overlooked mics.
    Not Crazydoc, but yea, the sm81 is an electret . . . and electrets don't require as much phantom, so it should be fine.

    And yea, these are some under-rated and often overlooked mics. Word has it quality control is starting to go down the tubes, however, so I might have some concern over some of the newer models.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Please forgive me. I don't mean to be a prick, but I guess I am.
    Age
    7
    Posts
    2,918
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    2104225
    Originally posted by omtayslick
    Hey Crazydoc,

    The other mic I would be using it with would be an SM81, which Shure says will operate at 12-48V. So it should work. Have you tried anything like this? I kind of wonder about any drop in performance. Also, how do you like the M37? I hear a lot about the Cads being good, often overlooked mics.
    What chessrock said.

    My only dual channel preamp is the audiobuddy, which has phantom power issues of its own, so I don't use it for the most part unless I need stereo - then I only use one channel. My other pre is the Joemeek MQ3, which I generally use as I usually only record one track at a time.

    I have not found the M37 to be very different from other cheap chinese mics in sound, with the hyped high end sizzle. However I need this personally as I have a high frequency hearing loss.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    1,298
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    49
    Originally posted by crazydoc
    I have not found the M37 to be very different from other cheap chinese mics in sound, with the hyped high end sizzle. However I need this personally as a have a high frequency hearing loss.
    It's the Chinese capsule that sizzles, but hey, it sounds good on some things, and my h.f. hearing is shot, too.

    The M-177 didn't sound that way. It was somehow not as bright but rich sounding. Same with M-Audio's new Luna mic.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •