Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Mesa Recto vs. Marshall Mode-IV vs. ?

  1. #1
    Mr. Moon's Avatar
    Mr. Moon is offline Force of Naked
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    223491

    Question Mesa Recto vs. Marshall Mode-IV vs. ?

    Sign in to disable this ad
    Hi.

    I've been looking for a 4x12 cabinet to use for gigging, for "band" practice (with a *LOUD* drummer and bass), and for recording. As I already have a Marshall 1965B 4x10 cab, I am looking for something that will cover the low-end better and not sound as "brittle" at higher volumes as the Marshall 1960-series 4x12 cabs I've used in the past. I will be using a Marshall JCM2000 DSL 100 watt head to power the cab. I use a 7-string guitar tuned down a half-step from standard tuning (Bb-Eb-Ab-Db-Gb-Bb-Eb), as well as 6-string guitars also tuned down a half step (Eb-Ab-Db-Gb-Bb-Eb), including "drop-tuning" on all guitars from time to time (i.e.: Db-Ab-Db-Gb-Bb-Eb).

    I have been looking at many brands, including Behringer, Crate, H&K, Peavey, etc., just to name a few. I've pretty much narrowed my search to either a Mesa Boogie 4x12 Recto standard, or one of the Marshall Mode-IV 280 watt cabs. Either way, I will be going with the straight-faced version, rather than slant version, to increase the low-end response.

    Any opinions about either of these cabs? Reliability? Durability? Even though I know they both have Celestion V-30's in them, any differences worth noting (i.e. speaker fatigue, etc.) between the different brands of cabs?

    Another thought I had was to get a less-expensive Behringer 4x12 cab, which appears to have a tad bit more internal cab volume (30.25" x 32.25" x 15") than the Mesa Recto standard (32.875" x 30.25" x 14.25"), and replace the drivers with a set of 4 Celestion V-30"s purchased from Mesa. That way, I could save a bit of money while still getting the larger sized cabinet and Mesa-ized versions of the Celestion V-30s. How much of a difference would the cheap press-board material of the Behringer cab make compared to the "solid" wood of the Mesa and Marshall cabs?

    Any suggestions or any other options out there I should look into?

    TIA!

    -mr moon
    Intel Core 2 QUAD Q9550
    4 GB 800MHz DDR2
    RME FireFace 800
    Windows 64 Pro

  2. #2
    Mr. Moon's Avatar
    Mr. Moon is offline Force of Naked
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    223491

    Update!

    OK. Here's an update, FYI.

    I went into the local Guitar Satan, on a "slow" weekday, and they locked me in a "quiet" room with a Marshall DSL100 head (same model I have), a Marshall Mode-4 280 watt cab, and a Mesa Recto standard 4x12 cab. I A/B'd between the Cabs for at least 1/2 hour or so, at moderate volumes, both clean and overdriven. I found that even thought the Marshall Mode-4 had more low-end response than the standard Marshall 1960a or 1960b cabs, it still had a bit too much mid-range "bark" for my taste. The Mesa was creamy and smooth across the entire frequency range.

    Needless to say, I went home with the Mesa.....

    -mr moon
    Intel Core 2 QUAD Q9550
    4 GB 800MHz DDR2
    RME FireFace 800
    Windows 64 Pro

  3. #3
    rvdsm is offline I'm a Newbie...Be Gentle!
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Jacksonville, Illinois
    Age
    38
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    13
    The Marshall 1960 TV 412 might be what you are looking for.

  4. #4
    Mr. Moon's Avatar
    Mr. Moon is offline Force of Naked
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    223491
    Originally posted by rvdsm
    The Marshall 1960 TV 412 might be what you are looking for.
    Thanks for the suggestion, but the Mesa is EXACTLY what I was looking for. This thing has "THE" sound that I was after, and sounds better the louder it gets! ...I can't wait to hear what it sounds like in a few months, once it has broken in a bit more!

    -mr moon
    Intel Core 2 QUAD Q9550
    4 GB 800MHz DDR2
    RME FireFace 800
    Windows 64 Pro

  5. #5
    rvdsm is offline I'm a Newbie...Be Gentle!
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Jacksonville, Illinois
    Age
    38
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    13
    Oh sorrry. I didn't catch the update thing.

  6. #6
    Sonic Misfit's Avatar
    Sonic Misfit is offline Dedicated Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    447
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    384439
    That was a good call. I was running my old Fender Bandmaster head through a Marshall 1960B 4x12 and found that the brighter tones seemed to lack sustain. I switched to a Mesa 2x12 open back with the black Celestions and it is not only much easier to transport, but I get both the low end and lots of sustain on the brighter tones.

    I think that some of it may have to do with the open back cab vs the closed back on the Marshall.

  7. #7
    Mr. Moon's Avatar
    Mr. Moon is offline Force of Naked
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    223491
    Originally posted by Sonic Misfit
    That was a good call. I was running my old Fender Bandmaster head through a Marshall 1960B 4x12 and found that the brighter tones seemed to lack sustain. I switched to a Mesa 2x12 open back with the black Celestions and it is not only much easier to transport, but I get both the low end and lots of sustain on the brighter tones.

    I think that some of it may have to do with the open back cab vs the closed back on the Marshall.
    The 4x12 Recto I got really covers the highs well too, but in a nice "creamy" way. ...I never knew what people meant by a "creamy" tone, until I tried this cab out.

    I dread the day I have to gig with the Mesa cab, due to its size... I'll probably first try using the 4x10 I have, and see how that works being miced and all. Actually, I'll probably take both to see which one works better, and gets the sound I want. If I have to lug around that huge @ss Mesa cab to get "the" sound, so be it!

    -mr moon
    Intel Core 2 QUAD Q9550
    4 GB 800MHz DDR2
    RME FireFace 800
    Windows 64 Pro

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Special 93% Offer

Got beats? Samples? Mixing and mastering services? Get a head start with this 93% OFF special offer!